Features
Are our parliamentarians devt agents or lawmakers?
- /home/u249204778/domains/spectator.com.gh/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/u249204778/domains/spectator.com.gh/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
&description=Are our parliamentarians devt agents or lawmakers?', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/u249204778/domains/spectator.com.gh/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/u249204778/domains/spectator.com.gh/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
&description=Are our parliamentarians devt agents or lawmakers?', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
A Parliament is made up of a group of people who make or change the laws of a country, whilst parliamentary is used to describe things that are connected with a parliament. The active players who are experts on parliamentary procedures, are known as Members of Parliament.
Ghana has a unicameral Legislature (one chamber) composed of 275 Members of Parliament (MPs) from single-member constituencies with an Executive President who appoints Ministers, majority of whom by the 1992 Constitution, have to come from Parliament. The Constitution further provides that the Speaker shall preside in Parliament at all sittings and in his absence, a Deputy Speaker should be in-charge. Another important positions in Ghana’s Parliament, are the Majority and Minority Leaders, who are supposed to initiate the Business of the House.
COMPOSITION OF GHANA’S PARLIAMENT
The current Speaker of Parliament is Alban Kingsford Sumana Bagbin with Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu, as the Majority Leader and Haruna Iddrisu as the Minority Leader. These are the most important personalities as far as the parliamentary procedures in Ghana are concerned. They are the people who are supposed to champion the cause of law making in this country and are, therefore, highly revered.
The debate which is currently going on within the society is that, looking critically at the functions of our august Parliament, the question that arises then is; Are our Parliamentarians development agents in their constituencies or purely lawmakers? This particular question, surfaces as a result of a comment purported to have been made by President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, during his recent tour of the Central Gonja District of the Savannah Region.
PRESIDENT’S VERBAL ATTACK ON JOHN JINAPOR
During his interaction with the chiefs and people at Yepei in the Central Gonja District of the Savannah Region during his two-day official visit to the region, President Akufo-Addo, took the MP for the Yapei-Kusawgu, John Abu Jinapor, to the cleaners, accusing him of failing to connect 17 communities in his constituency to the national electricity grid. That was when the Paramount Chief of the Yapei Traditional Area, Yapeiwura Dr. A.B.T. Zakariah, made an appeal to him to extend electricity to the 17 communities in his traditional area.
Hear the President: “In my lifetime, the Yapei-Kusawgu Constituency has produced two members of parliament, Alhaji Amadu Seidu, who was a former colleague in parliament and John Jinapor, also known as ‘J J’, who was one-time Deputy Minister of Energy. It is, therefore, surprising that about 17 communities in the constituency are still not connected to the national grid.” He said the MP for the area, John Jinapor, had failed to bring the needed development to the constituency and urged the people to reconsider their voting pattern in the 2024 election by voting for the New Patriotic Party (NPP). He said the educational development under John Jinapor was wanting as “there is no Senior Technical High School in the whole of Kusawgu area”.
The President’s verbal attacks on John Jinapor, has indeed, heightened the debate as to whether MPs should concentrate on development projects in their respective jurisdictions alongside their lawmaking function.
DIVERGENT VIEWS OF MPS ON THE ISSUE
There have been divergent opinions from some of our MPs themselves on this relevant issue which needs to be interrogated in order not to make it a political issue or gimmick.
As far back as February 2018, during the first term of President Akufo-Addo, his Majority Leader in the then Parliament and MP for Suame in the Ashanti Region, Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu, stated emphatically that MPs were not agents of development. According to him it was not the role of parliamentarians to fix roads, build health clinics, construct schools and expand other infrastructural development in their constituencies. He said the President, Metropolitan Municipal and District Assemblies and sector Ministers, were the only mandated bodies to provide development projects across the country.
Explaining the roles of MPs at a public forum in Tamale during that time, he said MPs were not agents of development and advised voters to stop judging their MPs based on number of roads they fixed. He buttressed his argument with past experiences in the Northern Region in 2016, in which some MPs who had served at least two terms and had gained some level of experience, lost their mandate, largely due to an alleged non-performance in the area of infrastructural development. Some of those MPs were also faced with stiffer competition and lost during their party’s internal elections, while others narrowly won to represent their parties. The notable losers included Ibrahim Abubakari Dei, former MP for Salaga South, Ibrahim Murtala Mohammed, former MP for Nanton and the late Abubakari Sumani, former MP for Tamale North.
MAJORITY LEADER’S OPINION
The Majority Leader, therefore, affirmed the commitment of parliamentary leadership to counter that growing culture through literacy crusade to educate voters on how MPs operate. Again in September 29, 2021, during an interview on an Accra-based Kingdom FM, the then Member of Parliament for Asante Akyem North, Lawyer Appiah Kubi, discounted the perception that lawmakers were development agents and described that as false. He maintained that the Metropolitan, Municipal and District Chief Executives (MMDCEs) were responsible for the development at the local level. He asked MPs to desist from creating the perception in the minds of their constituents that they were development agents.
OKUDZETO ABLAKWA THINKS OTHERWISE
But, contrary to these opinions, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, MP for North Tongu in the Volta Region, has a different opinion, saying that MPs are agents for development not only lawmakers. To him, while the primary job of parliamentarians is more of lawmaking, they must equally focus on developments in their respective constituencies. “I think that if you want to be an effective MP, you have to be versatile. Particularly, for a developing country like ours, you cannot say you will be an MP who focuses only on lawmaking. So, you can have part of you that develops the ability to be an agent for development. How to lobby for projects, how to pursue initiatives which will ease the burdens that your constituents have,” he said on Ghanaweb TV’s current affairs talk programme.
With some of these divergent views in vogue, some of the constituents still have the notion that it is the duty of their MPs to bring developments to their constituencies, hence the frequent confrontations and attacks on their MPs when they are not seeing these development projects. Just recently, some artisans at the Suame Magazine in the Ashanti Region attacked, pelted with sachet water and hooted at Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu, MP for the area, as an expression of displeasure with the lawmaker over failed promises, especially the bad nature of their roads.
PRESIDENT’S REMARKS INAPPROPRIATE
It is unfortunate that the President knowing very well that MPs are not sole agents of development but rather to complement the work of MMDCEs as far as development projects are concerned, should blame the lawmaker, John Jinapor, for not bringing development project to his constituency. In any case, the MP who belong to the minority side, will need financial backing from the government as he lobbies for projects for his constituency and also to prosecute that development agenda which the President spoke about when he addressed the people.
These empty promises during electioneering by most of our aspiring parliamentary candidates, can also be attributed to these frequent attacks and confrontations by the electorate. In the event that, they have promised to deliver certain projects during their campaigns and cannot meet these expectations of the people who gave them their mandates, the controversies and attacks will surely emanate. It is necessary for our politicians, especially prospective MPs to tone down some of these vain promises if they want to have their peace to continue with their work in parliament.
Contact email/WhatsApp of author:
ataani2000@yahoo.com
0277753946/0248933366
By Charles Neequaye
Features
The eye is indeed the lamp of the body
There is a scripture that is found in Matthew 6:22 which says that the lamp of the body is the eye and therefore the eye must see well to enable the body to get to its destination.
What most people do not know is that behind the scenes, there is a strong interaction between the eyes and the brain before a picture becomes clear. The state of mind therefore is crucial to the eye seeing clearly to enable the body to process accurately the information the eyes are feeding it for proper identification of what the eyes see.
This is similar to how a person behaves i.e. what informs the decisions that forms in the mind that results in the actions that a person performs. The actions of a person does not therefore just happen but is as a result of things that went on in the mind, which in most cases resulted from information passed on to it by the eyes either consciously or unconsciously.
There are so many issues that affect our society which makes one wonder, whether the people who displayed such acts were created by someone or something other than God.
How can a person see a beach created by God with beautiful beaches and fresh air blowing all around, decides to defecate at such places, and therefore desecrate the environment? lt is simply mind boggling?
When other people in other countries who dwell on the coast are using their beaches for tourist attraction purposes as a means of livelihood and also to promote environmental health, some people living around our beaches, have turned them into rubbish dumping sites and toilets.
It is a very sad situation and the earlier we did something about it the better. It is a national emergency that must engage the attention, first of the government and then the citizenry, where religious bodies and NGOs must play a critical role.
The things we focus on in this country, needs to be addressed. Our minds which processes the info the eyes send to the brain, must be disciplined. There are certain behaviours that a disciplined mind can ignore even when the eye has provided info to the brain. One of the things a disciplined mind does, is the avoidance of a second look, which is critical for every person who wants to avoid adultery or fornication.
Once a person is not blind, he will see things. The boobs, the ‘shankus’, the coca cola shapes, the light complexioned, the dark complexioned etc. the eyes will definitely see and report same to the brain. What the brain or the mind decides to do or instructs the eye to do is the issue.
It can decide to instruct the eye to take a second look and let the mind drool over it or say ignore it and that will be the end.
If the mind becomes trained to focus on environmental issues like clean environment, the eyes will automatically be reporting on insanitary conditions to the brain as and when it sees them. The mind will pay attention to such data and begin to process them and to identify solutions to deal with the reported insanitary conditions.
There is the need to encourage citizens to train the mind to focus on the right thing so that in tandem with the eyes, focus will be maintained. When the mind is so trained, it communicates with the eye to also focus on hood things that helps in both are spiritual life and our secular lives, for indeed the eyes are the lamp of the body. God bless.
Features
Arming the Sikaman journalists to the teeth

THE relationship between New Times Corporation (NTC) and African Concrete Productions (ACP) is based entirely on matters of the stomach. Each depends on the other in a dietary symbiosis, reinforced by the close proximity of each other
At lunchtime, you’d see a particular set of Times workers marching regimentally to ACP to face the wall. You’d think they are soldiers. It has long been declared that the company manufactures the best kokonte in the Greater Accra Region. ACP is, therefore, a culinary haven for those NTC kokonte fans, both male and female.
As the NTC kokonte warriors cross the border to ACP, you’d see some ACP banku fanatics dancing joyously to NTC. They are lucky folks because they do not have to obtain visa to enter into ‘Times’ to attack the balls of banku with precision and accuracy. They also claim that the lightsoup at ‘Times’ is arguably the best in West Africa.
So the relationship between the two entities was quite cordial and based practically on stomach palaver, until ACP workers staged an industrial revolution, whereupon the managing director, accountant and estate manager were allegedly stripped naked and locked up in a room. An insurgency had began in earnest.
An ACP worker came to ‘Times’, this time not to eat banku and okro. He had come to inform newsmen that juicy stuff awaited them at ACP. It could make a front page lead story.
A camerawoman and a female reporter were accordingly dispatched to go and bring back news, juicy news as juicy as kokonte and groundnut soup.
I was driving to work when I espied the familiar camerawoman clicking away outside the ACP premises. I didn’t see any ‘Times’ reporter but angry workers who were on the verge of getting violent. I slowed down and the driver behind blew his horn at me like a lunatic. I drove on.
Later, I heard the reporter and camerawoman were harassed and brutalised. The report came,. “The camerawoman, Mrs Salome Adonu-Agbottah and reporter Mrs Doreen Allotey, in an attempt to retrieve the camera which the workers had seized from them were severely beaten. They were manhandled and almost pushed into a big gutter opposite the company’s premises.
BRUISES
“….The camerawoman had bruises on her body, her hand bag was destroyed and the money in it stolen. Mrs Allotey’s watch was also snatched and her feet stamped on.”
Luckily, it was not her nose that was trampled upon. She has a beautiful nose.
The bad news was received with extreme sorrow. If the victims had been men, it would not have seemed too bad. But to brutalise women is just unacceptable. The New Times Corporation has not stopped mourning the incident which has been condemned in many circles.
Some people keep asking me why Times sent females to cover a potentially violent demonstration. I tell them they might as well ask why CNN’s amazon, Christina Amanpour, is assigned to cover the carnage in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Rwanda. She is always on the frontline in jeans and jacket.
Journalism is a potentially hazardous profession, and once you accept to study and practise the trade, you might as well bone up to face any assignment as long as your superiors feel you are capable of handling it or you have demonstrated the capacity to handle it. Both males and females can be assigned anywhere, anytime just like policemen and women are assigned.
The only difference between cops and pressmen is that the latter are armed only with a pen and the former with a gun. The question is should newsmen also arm themselves so that in any event of an assault they would not be found wanting in self-defence? They can’t adequately defend themselves with a pen and a jotter. A pen cannot even disfigure an opponent’s upper lip.
Photo-journalists have particularly suffered violence. Spectator ace-cameraman Vincent Dzatse was severely assaulted by AMA men when he attempted to take pictures of their indiscretions.
Sports cameraman, P. K. Arthur has been beaten more than once at the sports stadium when riots errupted and he wanted to capture it on his lenses.
Some sports journalists have been banned from entering the Accra Sports Stadium by supporters because in their comments, they didn’t write “sense”. Some supporters once nearly lynched Christian Abbew, Spectator Sports Editor, near a courtroom. He was stoned like the biblical Stephen. He had gone to defend a contempt charge.
I think it is time journalists met and discussed how best to defend themselves in any event of an attack by individuals or mobs. In the pursuance of their duty, they must be free from harassment and assault.
Some journalists go to work and return home with a black-eye or a double fore-head. It is just not right. Something has to be done about it. I think journalists should be armed. But first we must be trained in the use of firearms so that our warning shot do not hit below the belt. What about training in Kung Fu?
This article was first published on Saturday, October 17, 1998.




