Connect with us

Features

TUC nominates 2 ‘unfit persons’ to he boards of SSNIT and NPRA?

Trades unions are said to be continuous associations of workers formed for the purpose of maintaining and improving their conditions of employment.

Their aim is not merely to fight against wage cuts but also to fight for higher wages.

Broadly, trades unions perform two types of functions: (1) fraternal and mutual-help and (2) fighting or militant functions.

The fraternal functions include, organising social and infrastructure development for their members. These include; games, lectures and running of schools, clinics and hospitals for their members.

Advertisement

The militant functions of the unions refer to the struggles with their employers to get higher wages or for getting their grievances redressed.

Sometimes, however, for very good reasons,  the militant ‘gesticulations’ of some of the labour unions are directly pointed at their own leadership or specific members of constituted Boards of Trustees of state-interest institutions.

It is, therefore, not surprising that this column has sighted a petition addressed to the leadership of the Trades Union Congress of Ghana (TUC), for the withdrawal of two ‘unfit’ TUC nominees, appointed to represent Organised Labour on the boards of the Social Security and National Insurance Trust (SSNIT) and the National Pensions Regulatory Authority (NPRA).

Readers, the petition dated, 9th May, 2022, was directed to the Secretary General of the TUC and signed by Mr Seth Abloso, a Labour Consultant and a member of the Ghana Association of Certified Mediators and Arbitrators.

Advertisement

It was titled:”Petition for the withdrawal of unfit persons as representatives of Organised Labour on the Boards of Trustees of SSNIT and NPRA.”

The petition was copied to: (a) Member Unions of Organised Labour (b) the Governor of the Bank of Ghana (c) The Managing Director of GCB Bank LLC (d) the Chief Labour Officer (e) the Director General – SSNIT (f) the Chief Executive Officer – NPRA (g) the Executive Secretary – Ghana Anti-Corruption Coalition (h) the Executive Director – Ghana Integrity Initiative and the two “unfit persons”.

The petition reads:” I hereby petition you, in your capacity as convenor of Organised Labour, to take steps to have unfit persons who have been presented as representatives of Organised Labour on the Board of Trustees of SSNIT, as well as the Board of NPRA, withdrawn forthwith.

“They are, John Senanu Amagashie, General Secretary of the Union of Industry, Commerce and Finance Workers (UNICOF) and Alex Nyarku-Opoku, who doubles as National Chairman of UNICOF and a Manager of the Burma Camp branch of GCB Bank LLC.”

Advertisement

It must be noted that Mr Nyarku-Opoku is also the Chairman of the General Council of the TUC.

According to the petition:”Available evidence indicates that the two persons mentioned above have been involved in acts of dishonesty, by lying under oath in the execution of Credit Facility Agreement between UNICOF  and GCB Bank LLC, dated 12th May,  2020.”

The petition said: “An earlier ruling of the National Labour Commission (NLC) dated 2nd June 2017, which was subsequently affirmed by the High Court on 24th June 2019 in Suit No. MSIL/03/2019, had implications on the finances of UNICOF, besides the finding that Alex Nyarku-Opoku committed perjury.”

The petition reminded the TUC boss: “You would recall that I brought the 2nd June, 2017, ruling to your attention in a letter dated 14th February 2020.

Advertisement

“It comes as a surprise that notwithstanding the adverse findings in the ruling of the NLC, those identified as having been associated with practices that make them unfit to hold office, continue  in utter contempt of the NLC and go on to commit further acts of dishonesty in the Agreement with GCB Bank LLC.”

The petition strongly added: “It should be instructive to draw your attention to Section 177 of the Companies Act, 2019 (Act 992) – RESTRAINING FRAUDULENT PERSONS FROM MANAGING COMPANIES – and in particular to 177(1)(c) where a person has been culpable of a criminal offence, whether convicted or not, in relation to a body corporate or of fraud, or in breach of duty in relation to a body corporate, he or she shall not be a Director of or in any way, whether directly or indirectly , be concerned or take part in the management of a Company……”

According to the petition, “these developments and matters arising, there from, can neither be swept under the carpet nor ignored.

“It is, therefore, my expectation that you will take steps towards sanitising the frontline of Organised Labour to ensure that its affairs as well as the affairs of associated institutions are conducted with a high sense of integrity.”

Advertisement

So, in effect, the petition is asking the TUC leadership to replace the two “unfit” TUC nominees on SSNIT and NPRA Boards with new nominees who are “fit” to represent Organised Labour on the two boards.

Readers, the contention is that of the four TUC nominees on the Board of SSNIT representing Organised Labour, the petition is asking the TUC to withdraw only Mr Amagashie because the petition says, he is “unfit” to be appointed to the board.

Wikipedia defines ‘unfit’ as a thing or person not of the necessary quality to meet a particular purpose.

Synonyms for “unfit” include; unsuitable for, unsuited to, inappropriate to, ill-suited to, not good enough for, not cut out for and not up to scratch.

Advertisement

Readers, from the petition, the indication is that there are many and many workers who are “fit” and from which the TUC could effortlessly nominate to represent Organised Labour on relevant Boards of Trustees but the TUC ‘decided’ to nominate the two ‘highprofile’ but “unfit” persons to the boards of SSNIT and NPRA.

As we await the response to the petition from the leadership of the TUC, this column urgently urges the appropriate state institutions to investigate the matter as set out in the petition.

The outcome of the investigation, in the view of this column, must be published for public consumption.

This is because crucial matters concerning Organised Labour and its related institutions must be ‘mirrored’ in ‘a national glass’.

Advertisement

By G. Frank Asmah

Contact email/ WhatsApp of the author:

asmahfrankg@gmail.com (0505556179)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Features

Tears of Ghanaman, home and abroad

• Sikaman residents are more hospital to foreign guests than their own kin
• Sikaman residents are more hospital to foreign guests than their own kin

The typical native of Sikaman is by nature a hospitable creature, a social animal with a big heart, a soul full of the milk of earthly good­ness, and a spirit too loving for its own comfort.

Sikaman Palava
Sikaman Palava

Ghanaman hosts a foreign pal and he spends a fortune to make him very happy and comfortable-good food, clean booze, excellent accommoda­tion and a woman for the night.

Sometimes the pal leaves without saying a “thank you but Ghanaman is not offended. He’d host another idiot even more splendidly. His nature is warm, his spirit benevolent. That is the typical Ghanaian and no wonder that many African-Americans say, “If you haven’t visited Ghana. Then you’ve not come to Africa.

You can even enter the country without a passport and a visa and you’ll be welcomed with a pot of palm wine.

If Ghanaman wants to go abroad, especially to an European country or the United States, it is often after an ordeal.

Advertisement

He has to doze in a queue at dawn at the embassy for days and if he is lucky to get through to being inter­viewed, he is confronted by someone who claims he or she has the power of discerning truth from lie.

In short Ghanaman must undergo a lie-detector test and has to answer questions that are either nonsensical or have no relevance to the trip at hand. When Joseph Kwame Korkorti wanted a visa to an European country, the attache studied Korkorti’s nose for a while and pronounced judgment.

“The way I see you, you won’t return to Ghana if I allow you to go. Korkorti nearly dislocated her jaw; Kwasiasem akwaakwa. In any case what had Korkorti’s nose got to do with the trip?

If Ghanaman, after several at­tempts, manages to get the visa and lands in the whiteman’s land, he is seen as another monkey uptown, a new arrival of a degenerate ape coming to invade civilized society. He is sneered at, mocked at and avoided like a plague. Some landlords abroad will not hire their rooms to blacks because they feel their presence in itself is bad business.

Advertisement

When a Sikaman publisher land­ed overseas and was riding in a public bus, an urchin who had the impudence and notoriety of a dead cockroach told his colleagues he was sure the black man had a tail which he was hiding in his pair of trousers. He didn’t end there. He said he was in fact going to pull out the tail for everyone to see.

True to his word he went and put his hand into the backside of the bewildered publisher, intent on grab­bing his imaginary tail and pulling it out. It took a lot of patience on the part of the publisher to avert murder. He practically pinned the white mis­creant on the floor by the neck and only let go when others intervene. Next time too…

The way we treat our foreign guests in comparison with the way they treat us is polar contrasting-two disparate extremes, one totally in­comparable to the other. They hound us for immigration papers, deport us for overstaying and skinheads either target homes to perpetrate mayhem or attack black immigrants to gratify their racial madness

When these same people come here we accept them even more hospi­tably than our own kin. They enter without visas, overstay, impregnate our women and run away.

Advertisement

About half of foreigners in this country do not have valid resident permits and was not a bother until recently when fire was put under the buttocks of the Immigration Service

In fact, until recently I never knew Sikaman had an Immigration Service. The problem is that although their staff look resplendent in their green outfit, you never really see them any­where. You’d think they are hidden from the public eye.

The first time I saw a group of them walking somewhere, I nearly mistook them for some sixth-form going to the library. Their ladies are pretty though.

So after all, Sikaman has an Immi­gration Service which I hear is now alert 24 hours a day tracking down illegal aliens and making sure they bound the exit via Kotoka Interna­tional. A pat on their shoulder.

Advertisement

I am glad the Interior Ministry has also realised that the country has been too slack about who goes out or comes into Sikaman.

Now the Ministry has warned foreigners not to take the country’s commitment to its obligations under the various conditions as a sign of weakness or a source for the abuse of her hospitality.

“Ghana will not tolerate any such abuse,” Nii Okaija Adamafio, the Interior Minister said, baring his teeth and twitching his little moustache. He was inaugurating the Ghana Refu­gee and Immigration Service Boards.

He said some foreigners come in as tourists, investors, consultants, skilled workers or refugees. Others come as ‘charlatans, adventurers or plain criminals. “

Yes, there are many criminals among them. Our courts have tried a good number of them for fraud and misconduct.

Advertisement

It is time we welcome only those who would come and invest or tour and go back peacefully and not those whose criminal intentions are well-hidden but get exposed in due course of time.

This article was first published on Saturday March 14, 1998

Join our WhatsApp Channel now!
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBElzjInlqHhl1aTU27

Continue Reading

Features

 Decisions have consequences

 In this world, it is always important to recognise that every action or decision taken, has consequences.

It can result in something good or bad, depending on the quality of the decision, that is, the factors that were taken into account in the deci­sion making.

The problem with a bad decision is that, in some instances, there is no opportunity to correct the result even though you have regretted the decision, which resulted in the un­pleasant outcome.

This is what a friend of mine refers to as having regretted an unregreta­ble regret. After church last Sunday, I was watching a programme on TV and a young lady was sharing with the host, how a bad decision she took, had affected her life immensely and adversely.

Advertisement

She narrated how she met a Cauca­sian and she got married to him. The white man arranged for her to join him after the marriage and process­es were initiated for her to join her husband in UK. It took a while for the requisite documentation to be procured and during this period, she took a decision that has haunted her till date.

According to her narration, she met a man, a Ghanaian, who she started dating, even though she was a mar­ried woman.

After a while her documents were ready and so she left to join her husband abroad without breaking off the unholy relationship with the man from Ghana.

After she got to UK, this man from Ghana, kept pressuring her to leave the white man and return to him in Ghana. The white man at some point became a bit suspicious and asked about who she has been talking on the phone with for long spells, and she lied to him that it was her cousin.

Advertisement

Then comes the shocker. After the man from Ghana had sweet talked her continuously for a while, she decided to leave her husband and re­turn to Ghana after only three weeks abroad.

She said, she asked the guy to swear to her that he would take care of both her and her mother and the guy swore to take good care of her and her mother as well as rent a 3-bedroom flat for her. She then took the decision to leave her hus­band and return to Ghana.

She told her mum that she was re­turning to Ghana to marry the guy in Ghana. According to her, her mother vigorously disagreed with her deci­sion and wept.

She further added that her mum told her brother and they told her that they were going to tell her hus­band about her intentions.

Advertisement

According to her, she threatened that if they called her husband to inform him, then she would commit suicide, an idea given to her by the boyfriend in Ghana.

Her mum and brother afraid of what she might do, agreed not to tell her husband. She then told her hus­band that she was returning to Ghana to attend her Grandmother’s funeral.

The husband could not understand why she wanted to go back to Ghana after only three weeks stay so she had to lie that in their tradition, grandchildren are required to be present when the grandmother dies and is to be buried.

She returned to Ghana; the flat turns into a chamber and hall accom­modation, the promise to take care of her mother does not materialise and generally she ends up furnishing the accommodation herself. All the promises given her by her boyfriend, turned out to be just mere words.

Advertisement

A phone the husband gave her, she left behind in UK out of guilty conscience knowing she was never coming back to UK.

Through that phone and social media, the husband found out about his boyfriend and that was the end of her marriage.

Meanwhile, things have gone awry here in Ghana and she had regretted and at a point in her narration, was trying desperately to hold back tears. Decisions indeed have consequences.

NB: ‘CHANGE KOTOKA INTERNA­TIONAL AIRPORT TO KOFI BAAKO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT’

Advertisement

Join our WhatsApp Channel now!
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBElzjInlqHhl1aTU27

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending