Connect with us

Features

The political sprint race about to begin

Published

on

Sikaman Palava

Elections in Sikaman are often in­teresting, especially at the primary level. It is at this level that people can vote against you because your face is too bushy.

Others will vote for you because of your American haircut or your Ara­bic moustache which has been jer­ry-curled.

A delegate will cast a vote against you simply because he feels you are too fond of eating kokonte at ‘CHOP BETTER’ chop bar. He might not realise that your addiction to kokonte is like an addiction to cocaine and even if you become a head-of-state you cannot resist facing the wall.

Advertisement
• Elections in Sikaman
• Elections in Sikaman

At the primaries, you are given the passport to hell. Getting elected can be pretty easy, but given the nod can induce palpitation because it places a huge burden on your head. First, you must start looking for cash. You’ll start estimating the value of the cocoa farm your father left behind when he passed away.

Or will a foreign loan do?

Whatever it is, Ghana politics can­not be ran on an empty back pocket. You must budget for palm wine for the folks who’ll double as your foot-sol­diers; organisers of canopies and those who buy you ‘waakye’ and ‘pure-wa­ter’. They form the core of your utility staff. They are a necessary evil.

SQUASH

Naturally, some people won’t take palm wine. It doesn’t kick them! To then palm wine is softer than orange squash. So you have to budget for ‘ak­peteshie’ better known as ‘kele’. You must apportion money for hot kenkey and plenty of fish, because you’ll be advised that when you give somebody ‘ogoglo’, you better follow it up with food.

Advertisement

Your budget must include funeral donations, outdooring gifts, payment of school fees of people who irritate you, just to get the votes of their par­ents. When you put pen to paper and add money for courting floating voters and incidentals, you’ll start consider­ing whether it was worth entering the race.

The problem with it is that, once you have entered as an aspiring MP there is no U-turn. You can’t go and tell your constituents that based on your calculations you have decided to chicken out. You just don’t have the cash to finance your campaign so it is better to quit than face disgrace. That will not be.

OPTION

The option available is to seek a money lender and promise him that when you win, you’ll make him the Minister of Finance. And if he is stupid enough to believe it, then you are a goner.

Advertisement

The politicking becomes more inter­esting when you get to the presidential level. The problem with every politi­cian is that he (or she) has ambitions to become president one day either through providence or by mistake.

So the scramble to the nation’s top post can become quite frantic, because all manner of people keep day-dream­ing and fantasising about becoming president although they know somehow that it is impossible.

Getting to the top has nothing to do with fantasy. It takes hard-work to accomplish, aside all the other factors like charisma, financial support, pow­erful manifestoes and even political gimmicking.

When the Peoples National Conven­tion (PNC) held its congress, I fondly remembered Dr. Limann. He used to carry his campaign message by putting it on the lips of his countrymen. “Any challenger, no challenger! Dr Limann, no challenger.”

Advertisement

His supporters added spice to it: ‘Any challanga, no challanga, Dr. Limann, no challanga!’ Others in his team adopted the Jimmy Carter booster, “Jimmy who? Jimmy Carter!” Some newspapers carried it: “Li who? Limann!” And Limann won to kick start the third republic.

Soon Flt Lt. Jerry Rawlings start­ed eyeing the castle seat with keen interest. He had earlier warned Dr Limann to squat well on the stool and to do some house-cleaning. Dr. Limann agreed but soon forgot all – about the Jerry Rawlings accord, and – before Jack Robinson came to mind, the stool of power was wrestled from under his buttocks.

Today, Limann is no more. May his soul rest in peace. His political legacy is in the palms of Dr. Edward Mahama, a brilliant doctor turned politician. His ‘two sure two direct’ slogan caught on quite well as he appealed to the Zongo communities to rally to the PNC call.

Last Saturday, he became one of the men to have been elected three times to lead the party to the polls. It means his people have confidence in him. With his victory at congress comes the era of Kofi Wayo, the rapping-ma­chine who knows how to blow his own horn, because nobody will blow it for him anyway.

Advertisement

He has brought a hint of American politicking into the game and clinched 185 votes at congress, far less than Dr. Mahama. And he says he was very surprised to get that much. He had thought he would only get about 45. Surely, he’ll be made the flag bearer’s running mate and we can all expect fireworks as usual.

PRESSURE

The overall political temperature is rising gradually. Alliances are being discussed and forged. Those who have won primaries are busy developing high blood pressure. Others have already started having running stomachs. The excitement is rising day after day as the NPP and NDC warm up for the con­test of the decade. All the parties have elected their flag bearers.

What Ghanaians are praying for is peace. They value it because it is pre­cious. Politics is a game, not guerilla warfare. While campaigning on plat­forms, politicians should preach peace alongside their manifestoes.

Advertisement

What brings conflict? It is the tongue. If you mount a platform and start insulting political opponents, certainly that isn’t politics. It is simply war-mongering. Sometimes, it starts via the airwaves and it is carried to the platforms.

What the people want to hear is not how foolish you think your opponents are, but what you think you can do for dear Ghana. For once, let us forget about our opponents and preach the gospel of what we can do, for which reason we want the endorsement of the people of Sikaman.

This article was first published on Saturday, June 5, 2004

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Features

Culture of resignation    

Published

on

There is a culture that permeates all aspects of leadership in the advanced countries which I believe has contributed to the success in all aspects of their national lives.  Citizens strive to excel so that they will not find themselves in a situation where they would have failed, to necessitate a decision to resign.  

Countries where failure is frowned upon, it pushes the citizens to strive for success.  In our part of the world, failure and mediocrity has become an accepted norm and therefore, there is no shame in failing in a particular position of leadership.  

A head of an organisation mismanages the place and he does not see the need for him to resign.  The appointing authority does not also see the need to sack him and so the merry go round continues.  

It becomes friends and family as usual and if care is not taken, the rest of the world will leave us far, far behind.

Advertisement

The practice of resignation in parts of the world for failure in some parts of the world has to be institutionalised in our country too.  It encourages the principle of accountability which is good for any organisation, sector of an economy or a country.  

It promotes good governance, a necessary ingredient in the growth of the economy of any country.  

When this practice becomes a culture, every individual, privileged to hold a position of trust, gives his or her full attention to the job assigned him or her, to ensure that objectives are achieved.  

This trickles down to every individual down the chain of command and there are no rooms for errors.  

Advertisement

That is how efficient systems are built over time and this is the difference between advanced nations and third world countries.  

Where systems are designed such that people take responsibility for things that go wrong under their supervision or ultimate responsibility, there is evidence of development.

There are a few people that I admire in Ghana as far as this culture of resignation based on principled stance. One of them is the late Mrs Emma Mitchell.  She was a cabinet member but chose to resign after the confrontation between late President Jerry Rawlings and late Vice President Kow Akaah. 

 She was not prepared to be part of a cabinet which was lying to the general public that Rawlings did not assault Akaah.  

Advertisement

She was of the conviction that telling the truth is more honourable than telling lies and that if she was bound by confidentiality oaths to tell a lie, then she would resign and she did exactly that.  

That is how we build a culture of truth and accountability. We have people in positions who have not lived up to expectation but are still holding on to their positions not prepared to let go of it.  

This is a clear case of display of selfishness, trying to be a Boss instead of a Servant to serve the people, which leadership is all about.

The ineffectiveness of some leaders, often result in waste of resources which could have been channeled to other sectors of the economy which could have been more productive. A culture of voluntary resignation must be advocated for by all stakeholders, especially the CSOs, traditional leaders and the clergy.  

Advertisement

This is the only way the needed growth in every sector of our national life would manifest.  

Presidents, Prime Ministers, heads of reputable organisations have voluntarily resigned by taking ultimate responsibility and it is about time, we started seeing it manifest in our country.  

The people in charge of our sports especially our soccer, can initiate this long desired culture and resign in view of the embarrassment witnessed from the defeat of the Black Stars by Gambia. God bless.

BY LAUD KISS-MENSAH

Advertisement

SKIP THE QUEUE, TAP THE NEWS

You can now read the Ghanaian Times and The Spectator newspapers from the comfort of your device via TimesNewsPlus.

Join our WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBElzjInlqHhl1aTU27

Continue Reading

Features

Responding to religious insults with faith, wisdom and restraint (Part 2)

Published

on

THE QUR’AN FORBIDS RELIGIOUS PROVOCATION

There is a remarkable verse in the Qur’an which every Muslim preacher should memorise.

Allah says:

“And do not insult those they invoke besides Allah, lest they insult Allah in hostility without knowledge.” (Qur’an 6:108).

Advertisement

Think about this carefully.

Allah knows that the unbelievers worship false gods.

Yet Allah tells Muslims: Do not insult their objects of worship.

Why?

Advertisement

Because your speech may provoke an even greater offence.

This establishes a profound principle:

A Muslim must not fight religious provocation with religious provocation.

If someone insults what we hold sacred, we do not respond by insulting what they hold sacred.

Advertisement

If someone attacks Islam, we defend Islam with knowledge.

If someone misrepresents Muhammad (pbuh), we explain who is Muhammad to him.

If someone lies about Islam, we answer with truth and knowledge.

We do not allow another person’s bad behaviour to dictate our own morality.

Advertisement

LOOK AT MUHAMMAD (PBUH) — HE WAS INSULTED BEFORE WE WERE

Servant of Allah,

Sometimes we speak as though the Prophet (pbuh) lived in a world where everyone respected him.

No.

Advertisement

He was mocked and insulted. Quran 37:36, Quran 15:6

He was called a liar, magician, and a mad man. Quran 51:52, Quran 17:47

He was ridiculed. Quran 6:10

His followers were tortured, and some were killed. Quran 85:8-10

Advertisement

He himself was persecuted, leading to his migration to Madina.

Yet he remained the Messenger of Allah.

Allah said:

“Indeed, we know that your heart is distressed by what they say.” (Qur’an 15:97)

Advertisement

Allah acknowledged the Prophet’s pain.

Islam does not say that insults do not hurt. They hurt.

But the question is: What do you do with the pain?

THE DAY OF TA’IF: WHEN THE PROPHET (PBUH) COULD HAVE CHOSEN

Advertisement

REVENGE

One of the most powerful examples is the journey of the Prophet (pbuh) to Ta’if.

He went seeking support for his message.

Instead, the people rejected him and incited their children and others against him.

Advertisement

He was chased.

He was insulted.

He was struck with stones until his feet bled.

He was physically and emotionally exhausted.

Advertisement

Then the Angel of the Mountains came to him.

The two angels offered to crush the people of Ta’if between the mountains.

The Prophet (pbuh) could have said: “Do it.”

But he did not.

Advertisement

Instead, he hoped that Allah would bring from their descendants people who would worship Him.

This account is recorded in the authentic hadith literature, including Sahih Muslim (Muslim, 1795).

What a lesson!

The Prophet (pbuh) had suffered injustice.

Advertisement

But he did not turn his pain into indiscriminate revenge.

He saw beyond the offender.

He saw the possibility of tomorrow.

And this is one of the greatest characteristics of prophetic leadership:

Advertisement

The Prophet (pbuh) did not merely ask, “What punishment does this person deserve?”

He also asked, in effect: “What can this person become?”

THE PROPHET IN MADINAH: LEADER OF A DIVERSE SOCIETY

When Muhammad (pbuh) migrated to Madinah, he did not enter an empty city.

Advertisement

Madinah contained different communities, including Muslims and Jews, and there were also Christians who interacted with the Muslim community.

The Prophet became the political and communal leader of Madinah.

The Sahifah (A Covenant) of Madinah, preserved in the early sīrah (Prophet’s biography) tradition, established arrangements concerning mutual obligations, security, justice and relations among the communities of the city.

This is important:

Advertisement

The Prophet did not build Madinah by teaching Muslims to hate everyone who was not Muslim.

He built a society governed by covenant, responsibility and justice.

Allah says:

 “Allah does not forbid you from being kind and just to those who have neither fought you because of your religion nor driven you from your homes. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly.” (Qur’an 60:8)

Advertisement

This is not weakness.

This is Islam.

THE PROPHET DEALT WITH JEWS IN MADINAH

‘A’ishah (Wife of the Prophet) narrated that the Prophet (pbuh) bought food from a Jewish man on credit and gave him his iron armour as collateral.

Advertisement

“The Prophet purchased food from a Jew on credit and mortgaged his iron armour to him.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, 2068)

Think about it.

This was Muhammad.

The Messenger of Allah.

Advertisement

Yet he conducted lawful commercial dealings with a Jewish citizen.

He did not say: “He is not a Muslim, therefore I cannot deal with him.”

No.

Islam gave him a relationship governed by justice and trust.

Advertisement

Jabir رضيهللاعنه narrated:

“A funeral procession passed before us and the Prophet (pbuh) stood up, and we stood with him. We said, ‘O Messenger of Allah, it is the funeral of a Jew.’ He said: ‘When you see a funeral procession, stand.’” (Sahih al-Bukhari, 1311)

Another narration records his response: “Is it not a soul?” (Sahih al-Bukhari, 1312–1313)

What kind of heart did Muhammad (pbuh) possess?

Advertisement

A heart that recognised human dignity even in death.

THE PROPHET AND THE CHRISTIANS OF NAJRAN

The Prophet also received the Christian delegation of Najran.

They disagreed with him theologically.

Advertisement

Yet when they requested a trustworthy person, he did not choose someone because of hatred.

He selected Abu ‘Ubaydah ibn al-Jarrah.

The Prophet said:

“I shall send with you a man who is truly trustworthy.”

Advertisement

He then appointed Abu ‘Ubaydah.

This is authentically reported in Sahih al-Bukhari 4380–4381.

Notice something profound:

The Prophet could disagree with people without becoming dishonest toward them.

Advertisement

That is the standard we need today.

The author is the chief Imam of Katamanso Municipal and Certified Counsellor and Governance Expert.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending