Nutrition
The true cost of free healthcare: Why NHIS must cover essential nutrition services
Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) has transformed healthcare access for millions of people. Since its establishment, the scheme has reduced out-of-pocket health spending and increased the use of healthcare services. For many families, an NHIS card means the difference between seeking treatment and delaying care. Yet this promise of accessible healthcare encounters significant limitations when families face nutrition emergencies.
Consider a mother whose child develops severe acute malnutrition (SAM). This life-threatening condition affects an estimated 68,000 children in Ghana and carries a mortality risk up to nine times higherthan that of well-nourished children. The good news is that SAM can be treated effectively. Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food (RUTF), a peanut-based therapeutic food that allows children with uncomplicated malnutrition to recover through community-based treatment. Recovery rates typically range between 75 and 90 per cent, with very low mortality when treatment is delivered early. RUTF is not an experimental intervention. It is included in Ghana’s Essential Medicines List and the Standard Treatment Guidelines, and health workers across the country are trained to use it.
Yet RUTF is not covered under the NHIS benefits package.
This means that even when a mother holds a valid NHIS card, the scheme may cover consultation fees and routine medicines but not the one treatment that could save her child’s life. Access often depends on whether a donor-funded program happens to be operating in her district. If supplies run out, or if her district is not part of a project, treatment may simply not be available. This is the hidden cost of healthcare that appears free on paper but remains inaccessible in practice.
The pattern repeats with maternal nutrition. An estimated 37 to 63 per cent of pregnant women in Ghana experience anemia, depending on the stage of pregnancy. While iron and folic acid supplements help address two nutrients, pregnancy increases the body’s demand for many more vitamins and minerals. Multiple Micronutrient Supplements (MMS) provide 15 essential vitamins and minerals in a single daily tablet. Evidence shows that MMS can reduce low birth weight by about 12 per cent, preterm birth by about 11 per cent, and small-for-gestational-age births by around 8 percent.
Despite these benefits, access remains limited. A full course of MMS during pregnancy costs about $2.50 in public-sector procurement, yet current pilot programs reach only a small fraction of pregnancies. Most pregnant women enrolled in NHIS receive antenatal consultations and iron-folic acid tablets, but comprehensive micronutrient supplementation is not yet routinely available through the system. As a result, women who can afford supplements from private pharmacies may receive more comprehensive care, while others rely on more limited options. These gaps create what economists call “false savings”.
When children with severe malnutrition cannot access RUTF early, their condition may worsen, requiring costly hospitalisation and medical care. When pregnant women lack adequate micronutrient support, complications during pregnancy and childbirth can generate healthcare costs far greater than the cost of prevention.
In other words, excluding essential nutrition interventions from NHIS may appear to save money in the short term, but it often raises healthcare costs later while worsening health outcomes. The encouraging news is that the infrastructure to address this gap already exists. A large majority of mothers with young children in Ghana are already enrolled in NHIS. Health facilities have trained staff, established antenatal care systems, and experience delivering nutrition services.
What remains is a policy decision. Integrating RUTF and MMS into the NHIS benefits package would ensure that families enrolled in the scheme can access these essential services when they need them most.
Healthcare that appears free but excludes life-saving nutrition services is healthcare that fails at critical moments. Including these interventions under NHIS would not simply expand the benefits package. It would complete the promise of universal health coverage, ensuring that Ghanaian mothers and children receive the care they need to survive and thrive.
Feature article by Women, Media and Change under its Nourish Ghana: Advocating for Increased Leadership to Combat Malnutrition project
Nutrition
Health benefits of Soya beans

Soya beans is a highly nutritious plant-based food with several health benefits:
-Rich source of protein
-Contains all nine essential amino acids, making it a complete protein.
-Helpful for vegetarians and vegans as an alternative to animal protein.
-Supports muscle growth and repair.
– Heart Health
-Helps lower cholesterol levels
-Contains healthy unsaturated fats and fibre that support cardiovascular health
-Can be part of a heart-friendly diet
-Bone health
-Provides calcium (in fortified soy products), magnesium, and protein
-Soy isoflavones may help maintain bone density, especially in postmenopausal women
– May help manage menopausal symptoms
-Contains natural compounds called isoflavones (phytoestrogens)
-Some women experience reduced hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms with soy consumption
-Supports weight management
-High protein and fibre content can increase fullness and reduce hunger
-May help with maintaining a healthy weight
-Good for blood sugar control
-Has a low glycemic index
-Protein and fibre can help stabilise blood sugar levels
Nutrition
Ghana’s National Nutrition Council: The governance body we need now

Ghana has nutrition policies. Ghana has nutrition targets. Ghana has nutrition programmes spread across multiple ministries and dozens of implementing partners.
What Ghana does not have is a single, empowered body responsible for leading, coordinating, and holding all this together. That is the gap a National Nutrition Council would fill, and stakeholders are calling for one now.
The case for a council
At a stakeholder engagement convened under the Nourish Ghana project in 2025, participants proposed the establishment of a National Nutrition Council to provide effective leadership and a governance framework for addressing malnutrition in Ghana. The meeting, which brought together policymakers, development partners, civil society organisations, and the media, highlighted a fundamental problem: nutrition responsibilities are fragmented across various ministries. Without a dedicated coordination body, efforts are duplicated, accountability is diffuse, and nutrition consistently loses out when budgets are tight.
The proposal echoes a model used in several countries that have made the fastest progress against malnutrition. Nigeria’s National Council on Nutrition, for example, recently pledged $107 million at the 2025 N4G Summit, a level of coordinated ambition that Ghana has struggled to match.
Ghana does have existing coordination structures worth acknowledging. The Scaling Up Nutrition Cross-Sectoral Planning Group (CSPG), established in 2012, was set up to harmonise planning, implementation, and monitoring of nutrition actions across sectors. It has produced real gains. But the challenge has been institutionalising those gains beyond project cycles, and analysts have called for an elevated national coordination body with presidential oversight to ensure genuine cross-sector accountability. A National Nutrition Council would go further, providing the dedicated financing and convening authority that the CSPG, as currently structured, does not have.
What a Council would do
A National Nutrition Council would provide political oversight and coordination across all sectors involved in nutrition, health, agriculture, education, social protection, and finance. It would track Ghana’s nutrition commitments, hold ministries accountable for delivery, and ensure that nutrition budgets are protected and spent effectively. Most importantly, it would give nutrition a permanent seat at the table where national development decisions are made.
The Time Is Now
Ghana made 10 commitments at the 2025 N4G Paris Summit. Translating those commitments into results requires a governance structure that does not currently exist. Establishing a National Nutrition Council is not a bureaucratic exercise. It is the institutional foundation without which Ghana’s nutrition ambitions will remain promises on paper. Leaders must act on this proposal without delay.
Feature article by Women, Media and Change under its Nourish Ghana: Advocating for Increased Leadership to Combat Malnutrition project




