Editorial
Spare us the increment
● Pure water should not be expensive
Dear Editor,
About two years ago, the Association of Sachet Water Producers decided to increase the unit price of sachet water from 0.20 pesewas to 0.30 pesewas, citing increase in utility tariffs and cost of production as contributory factors.
There was some level of surprise and outrage but the public had to buy at that price because water is an essential commodity.
About two days ago, I decided to buy three pieces of sachet water (pure water) at the usual 0.30 pesewas each. The seller after serving me told me there were plans to increase the price to 0.40 pesewas. I was alarmed and told her to go and inform their association that citizens, including myself, were not ready to buy sachet water at that price.
I went further to ask what had informed the new price and she cited the recent increase in water tariffs by the Public Utilities Regulatory Commission (PURC) but again, I retorted that the new tariff still did not warrant the sudden increase of 0.40 pesewas per sachet.
Upon reaching my destination, I pondered over how the ordinary person on the street may not be able to afford ‘pure water’ sometime in future. If the proposed 0.40 pesewas per sachet is granted, it means a bag of pure water would be sold between GH¢7.00 and GH¢8.00 and it may eventually reach GH¢10.00. This, I believe, is not the way to go.
I have always maintained that irrespective of general hike in prices, some basic commodities should not be affected. If I were the government I would put a price ceiling on some essential commodities to make life easier for ordinary citizens and prevent businesses from exercising ‘arbitrary powers.’
I, therefore, wish to use your medium to inform the association of sachet water producers to spare us the proposed increment. We can’t die of thirst just because they want to make profit!
Frank Thompson,
Maamobi, Accra.
Dear Editor,
I wish to use this esteemed platform to urge the traditional councils of Osu and La to call for independent investigation into the recent demolition exercise at Kaajaano.
The exercise rendered hundreds homeless.
Information about the reason for the demolition has been scanty with those desiring to know feeding heavily on social media posts.
One particular name –Jato, has been associated with it but under whose instruction the exercise was carried is also not known.
Sadly, instead of getting to know who ordered the demolition and for what reasons, traditional authorities of Osu and La have been embroiled in a tug-of-war over ownership of the said land.
This is premature. At this moment, they should call for investigation into the exercise to know the people behind it.
When that is done, then discussions about the owners of the site can begin. That would end the posture of the two neighbouring town which has the potential to turn into something else.
Ataa Osa Mensah,
Osu
Dear Editor,
I wish to use your respected platform to draw the attention of the Bank of Ghana (BoG) to the behaviour of traders and some drivers about the use of lower denomination coins, specifically the 20 and 10 pesewas.
About two weeks ago, I read in your sister newspaper, The Ghanaian Times about this problem and the caution that followed from the BoG and some economic analysts.
The warning they gave was that the continuous rejection of the notes could create pricing problems which can eventually affect inflation.
I thought that would put to bed that practice or refusal to accept the coins when given out as change or use to pay for particular service.
Unfortunately, the problem still persist among traders, drivers, customers and passengers alike. Only last week, there was as altercation in the Accra Central area where a woman refused to accept five 20 pesewas note totaling one cedi.
As the argument continued, the trader decided not to sell to the customer again after by-standers explained to her that it was still a legal tender and those that refused it could become offenders.
This is an issue the BoG and other regulatory agencies must go and explain to the people and let them know that it is unlawful not to accept a currency that is still in use.
It nothing was done, it could create a much more serious problems.
Mary Osei Badu,
Swedru
