Connect with us

News

Time poverty, nutrition crisis: How working hours are reshaping diets of families

Published

on

Grace Fia
Grace Fia

In many Ghanaian households today, the workday no longer ends at 5pm. In busy Ghanaian cities such as Accra and Kumasi, parents experience traffic-clogged streets. Traders and market women rise before dawn, health workers are on rotating shifts, and informal-sector workers juggle multiple jobs, thus, long work hours have become the norm rather than the exception. While these extended hours may help to keep some families financially afloat, they are also quietly changing dietary patterns in ways that threaten the health of both parents and their children.

Ghana cannot lecture families into healthy eating while work and commuting steal the time needed to cook, we must treat time poverty as a nutrition risk and design policy around it. A recent study published in the Journal of Development Effectiveness confirms what many Ghanaian parents already feel that when time is scarce, nutrition is the first sacrifice. Also, in the Greater Accra Region, researchers from Feminist Economics have highlighted that long working hours and long commutes are pushing families especially women, away from traditional, nutritious diets toward convenience foods that are cheap, fast, and unhealthy. This shift is contributing to under nutrition in children and the rising rate overweight, obesity, and diet-related chronic diseases among adults and adolescents.

Parents who work long hours have little time available to themselves. Meal planning, food preparation, and shared family meals may be reduced at home due to exhaustion. As a result, households increasingly rely on ultra-processed foods, fried foods, sugary beverages, and refined carbohydrates. These foods are energy-dense but nutrient-poor, lacking essential micronutrients such as iron, zinc, vitamin A, and folic acid, nutrients critical for child growth and cognitive development.

Children are especially vulnerable. When parents are time constrained, children’s diets are shaped by caregivers, older siblings, or their own food choices. Breakfast may be skipped entirely, lunch money may often be spent on pastries, sweetened drinks, instant noodles, or fried snacks sold near schools and dinner, when it happens, may be eaten late at night and consist of leftovers or fast food. Over time, these patterns increase the risk of stunting, micronutrient deficiencies, and obesity.

Advertisement

For parents themselves, the health consequences are equally troubling. Long work hours are associated with irregular eating patterns and heavy reliance on fast foods. Combined with physical inactivity and chronic stress, these dietary habits increase the risk of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases and conditions that are already rising rapidly in Ghana.

Some may argue that the issue is not working hours but personal responsibility. After all, healthy Ghanaian foods such as “kontomire” stew, beans, millet porridge, vegetables, fruits, still exist and are still popular diets. But this argument overlooks structural reality. A parent who spends three hours commuting and ten hours working has limited capacity to shop daily and cook from scratch. In this context, food choices are shaped less by preference and more by time constraints, labour conditions, and urban design.

Others may point out that long working hours are unavoidable in a developing economy, particularly in the informal sector where social protections are weak. That may be true, but accepting long hours as inevitable does not mean ignoring their health consequences. Public health policy must adapt to these realities rather than pretend they do not exist.

So what then must be done? Addressing this issue requires coordinated action across sectors. The Ministry of Health and Ghana Health Service should recognize time poverty as a determinant of diet and promote workplace nutrition standards, including protected meal breaks. Employers, education authorities, and local assemblies must strengthen healthy food environments in workplaces and schools while incentivizing vendors to provide more nutritious options. Transport and urban planning authorities should also reduce commuting time, as time savings can support healthier household dietary practices.

Advertisement

Ghana cannot afford to treat dietary patterns as a purely private matter. When parents’ long work hours distort what families eat, the consequences ripple across generations, affecting child growth, adult productivity, and the future burden on the health system. If we are serious about improving nutrition and health, we must look beyond the plate and confront the working conditions that shape what ends up on it. The health of Ghana’s parents and children depends on it.

By Grace Fia

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

NPP condemns Camilla Alhassan’s jail sentence, announces support for appeal

Published

on

The New Patriotic Party (NPP) has condemned the one-year prison sentence handed to Madam Camilla Alhassan by the Accra Circuit Court, describing the conviction as a threat to free speech and constitutional democracy in Ghana.

In a statement issued on July 16, 2026, and signed by the party’s General Secretary, Justin Kodua Frimpong, the NPP said it was shocked by the court’s decision to convict and sentence Madam Alhassan for offensive conduct over comments she made online about President John Dramani Mahama.

The party argued that imprisoning a citizen over comments made in the exercise of free expression raises serious constitutional concerns, insisting that freedom of speech is protected under Article 21 of the 1992 Constitution.

According to the NPP, if the President believed he had been defamed, the appropriate remedy should have been a civil defamation suit rather than criminal prosecution.

Advertisement

The statement accused the state of using the police, the Attorney General and the courts to punish a citizen for expressing an opinion, adding that such actions could discourage Ghanaians from freely expressing their views.

The NPP criticised the treatment of Madam Alhassan during the court proceedings and after her conviction.

It described the manner in which she was handled by security officers as dehumanising and said it undermined the dignity of the individual and public confidence in law enforcement.

The party called on the Ghana Police Service to uphold the Constitution and protect the rights of citizens rather than become an instrument of intimidation.

Advertisement

It further appealed to civil society organisations, the Ghana Bar Association, the media and human rights groups to speak against what it described as the criminalisation of free expression.

The NPP urged the National Peace Council to encourage the government to uphold constitutional freedoms, while calling on the diplomatic community and Ghana’s international partners to continue supporting democratic values and the protection of civil liberties in the country.

The party announced that it would support an immediate appeal against Madam Alhassan’s conviction and sentence.

It pledged to stand with her and her legal team to pursue every lawful avenue to challenge the ruling.

Advertisement

The NPP maintained that Ghana must not return to a period where citizens fear expressing their views, stressing that it would continue to defend the constitutional rights of Ghanaians to speak freely and hold those in authority accountable.

By: Jacob Aggrey

Continue Reading

News

Chief criticises NPP General Secretary over handling of Afigya Sekyere East election dispute

Published

on

The Chief of Agric Nzema in the Ashanti Region, Nana Nkansah Boadu, has criticised the General Secretary of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Justin Frimpong Kodua, over his handling of the party’s parliamentary primary dispute in the Afigya Sekyere East Constituency.

Speaking on Okay Fm on July 16, 2026, Nana Nkansah Boadu accused Mr. Kodua of failing to properly manage the aftermath of the constituency election, which was marred by chaos and later led to legal and internal party disputes.

According to him, the General Secretary focused on administrative decisions instead of checking on the welfare of party members following the disturbances.

He claimed that after the incident, he personally visited the constituency to ensure party supporters were safe, adding that Mr. Kodua did not make similar efforts.

Advertisement

“I went to check whether everybody was safe after the incident, but all he was thinking about was cancelling the elections,” Nana Nkansah Boadu alleged.

He further warned against any attempt to annul the outcome of the constituency election, insisting that party members would resist such a decision.

“If he thinks he should cancel the elections, he will see. If he is a man, let him say the elections should be conducted again. Nobody will go and vote,” he stated.

The traditional leader also alleged that there was growing dissatisfaction among party supporters over the handling of the matter, claiming that some members had staged demonstrations against the General Secretary’s actions.

Advertisement

In addition, Nana Nkansah Boadu accused Mr. Kodua of prioritising money and political interests over the unity and welfare of the party, alleging that his leadership style had contributed to the NPP’s challenges in opposition.

He further criticised Mr. Kodua’s role in the Afigya Sekyere East dispute, which followed the party’s parliamentary primary and later resulted in legal action and the arrest of one of the aspirants, Kwabena Afrifa.

By: Jacob Aggrey

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending