Features
Semester versus term system in second cycle institutions

Different educational systems are usually developed and implemented by countries to ensure that trainees, both young and old, are properly developed with the adequate knowledge and skills they need to enable them provide socioeconomic development for the people in their countries.
In the United Kingdom (UK) for example, the system of education may be different from the United States (US) but at the end of the day it is the implementation of the knowledge and skills that are needed to develop the respective countries.
USING DIFFERENT IDEAS
The two countries or any other country may, therefore, have to use its own ideas to groom its young ones to come out as scholars who can meet the challenges of life and build their countries to become prosperous entities.
THE SEMESTER SYSTEM
The decision of the Ministry of Education to change its position on the implementation of the semester system to that of the term system was the result of disagreements between the Ministry on one hand and the Teacher Unions on the other.
To begin with, a semester system is where the academic year is divided into two main portions, that is, first and second semesters, while the term system usually uses three portions of time for the academic year.
SEMESTER AND TERM SYSTEMS
The semester system usually consists of about 16 weeks while the term system is also made up of about 12 weeks. In either case, each of the systems covers the academic calendar to ensure that adequate preparations are made for students or pupils.
These different systems are used in various parts of the world depending on the preference of the school authorities.
DISAGREEMENTS
The Ministry of Education in Ghana had wanted to introduce the semester system for schools operating under the Ghana Education Service but members of the teacher unions had some disagreements with the change over.
Many of them said the shift from the term system to the semester system was a major change in policy for which they should have been consulted. The Ministry on its part stated that some consultations were made.
OPPOSITION TO NEW SYSTEM
Probably the consultations did not go down well with the teacher unions, hence the decision to oppose it.
CONSULTATIONS
In such change overs, we wish to encourage the ministry to ensure that the teachers are adequately consulted for their views so that they will become part of the programme.
Adequate consultation is necessary because it allows for ventilation of views on the subject matter. In addition, all disagreements can be ironed out before the implementation of the programme.
Again, adequate consultation ensures that stakeholders feel to have become part of the new system thereby owning it. Once there is a sense of ownership, the stakeholders will be more willing to embrace its implementation to the letter.
There is no doubt that the Ministry of Education meant well for all stakeholders in the education sector. The disagreement over the semester system only shows that the stakeholders felt that they were not adequately consulted over the matter.
ABSENCE OF MALICE
Similarly, the teacher unions which opposed the semester system that was to be introduced could not have acted out of malice. Rather, all the stakeholders acted in good faith but in matters of this nature, we all need to ensure that there is a common understanding of the issues at stake to avert any possible confusion and disagreement.
PROBLEMS WITH NEW SYSTEMS
The introduction of new systems have always brought about such problems.
Many years ago, all institutions of learning, higher and lower, were running the term system until it became necessary for our tertiary institutions to adopt the semester system for some good reason.
Before the adoption by the tertiary institutions, there was a little confusion as to why the change to the semester system, but today, it has become an adopted norm for institutions of higher learning. What did the trick was the sensitisation and education of authorities at the tertiary level to understand, appreciate and accept the new system.
Similarly, teacher unions operating under the Ghana Education Service would want adequate exchange of views on the new system so that they can appreciate the justification for the change over.
WORKING TOGETHER
The Ministry of Education, the Ghana Education Service and all institutions at the primary and second cycle levels must continue to work together with all stakeholders so that at the end of it all, the country will benefit from the implementation of systems that are meant to bring about quality education in the country.
Contact email/ahatsApp of author:
Pradmat2013@gmail.com (0553318911)
BY DR. KOFI AMPONSAH BEDIAKO
Features
Fix It Fast or Lose Them Forever: The Ever-Rising Importance of Service Recovery in Competitive Industries

Yes, in literature and in practice, differences exist regarding customer service, service failures, and service recovery.
But have you ever considered the latter (service recovery) and its potential impact on service experience, brand building, and sustainable growth?
Well, in today’s fiercely competitive service economy, customer experience has become one of the most powerful determinants of business survival and long-term success.
Across industries, from aviation and banking to telecommunications, hospitality, healthcare, retail, and digital platforms, customers now expect fast, seamless, and reliable service delivery at every touchpoint.
Yet despite technological advancements and operational improvements, service failures remain inevitable.
Systems experience downtime, deliveries are delayed, reservations are misplaced, payments fail, customer inquiries go unanswered, employees mishandle interactions, and digital platforms experience disruptions.
In the midst of these, what increasingly separates successful organisations from struggling ones is not whether failures occur, but how quickly and effectively they recover when they do.
Service Recovery
Simply put, it is the process of fixing a service problem and restoring customer confidence after a failure has occurred.
Examples of service recoveries are; an airline offering compensation after a flight delay, a telecom company restoring interrupted service and providing bonus data, a restaurant replacing a wrongly prepared meal at no extra cost, a hotel upgrading a guest’s room after a booking problem, and finally a bank reversing an erroneous transaction and apologising promptly.
As competition intensifies and customer expectations continue to rise, service recovery is rapidly evolving from a routine customer service function into a critical strategic capability.
Businesses are discovering a hard truth of the modern marketplace: fix customer problems quickly, or risk losing them permanently.
Customers are More Powerful Now Than Ever
Customers now possess more power than at any other time in business history. Digital technology, social media, online reviews, and mobile connectivity have fundamentally changed customer behaviour.
Consumers now easily compare competitors instantly, publicly share negative experiences, switch providers with ease, and influence the purchasing decisions of thousands of others online.
This evolution has made customer loyalty increasingly fragile. A single poor experience can quickly damage years of brand-building effort.
In highly competitive sectors where products and pricing are often similar, customer experience has emerged as one of the few sustainable competitive advantages.
Modern customers no longer evaluate organisations solely by product quality or pricing. Increasingly, they judge businesses by their responsiveness, reliability, transparency, empathy, and effectiveness in resolving problems.
Why Service Recovery Matters More Than Ever
Failures are no longer viewed as isolated operational incidents, especially in competitive service sectors. They are moments that directly influence customer trust, brand perception, and future purchasing behaviour.
Research across service industries consistently demonstrates that customers are often willing to forgive mistakes when organisations respond quickly, communicate honestly, show empathy, and resolve issues effectively.
Conversely, poor recovery experiences frequently create stronger dissatisfaction than the original service failure itself.
For many businesses, the greatest reputational damage does not arise from operational errors, but from delayed responses, poor communication, lack of accountability, and unresolved customer frustrations.
This has elevated service recovery into a central component of customer relationship management and competitive strategy.
Speed, a Competitive Weapon
In the modern service economy, speed is no longer merely operational efficiency; it is a basic customer expectation.
Consumers increasingly expect: immediate responses, real-time updates, fast complaint resolution, and proactive communication. Delays are often interpreted as incompetence, indifference, or organisational inefficiency.
Consequently, organisations are redesigning their service recovery frameworks to prioritize rapid intervention and customer reassurance.
A cursory assessment revealed that some businesses now operate dedicated customer experience teams, 24/7 support systems, AI-powered service platforms, automated escalation systems, and real-time issue monitoring dashboards.
The ability to resolve customer problems quickly is now a major source of competitive differentiation.
Technology Is Transforming Recovery Strategies
Technology is fundamentally reshaping how organisations manage service recovery. Across industries, companies are leveraging artificial intelligence, customer analytics, chatbots, predictive monitoring systems, and integrated digital support platforms.
These tools allow organisations to identify service failures earlier, monitor customer dissatisfaction, automate responses, personalize engagement, and accelerate resolution timelines.
Some organisations now proactively contact customers before complaints are formally lodged, using analytics to identify service disruptions in real time.
This means that the future of service recovery is increasingly preventive rather than purely reactive.
Service Recovery as a Brand Strategy
Forward-looking organisations are now treating service recovery as part of brand management strategy rather than operational damage control.
The logic is straightforward because, acquiring new customers is expensive, dissatisfied customers influence others, and loyalty is increasingly experience-driven.
Businesses are therefore measuring customer satisfaction, response times, complaint resolution rates, customer retention, and net promoter scores more aggressively than before.
In many industries, service recovery performance is now discussed at executive and board levels because of its direct relationship with profitability, reputation, and long-term growth.
A call to action
As industries become more digital, interconnected and customer-driven, service recovery will likely become even more important.
Therefore, organisations that succeed in the future will likely be those that respond rapidly, communicate transparently, empower employees, leverage technology intelligently, treat customers fairly, and place their (customers’) trust at the centre of recovery strategies.
Remember, customers now have more choices, less patience, and greater influence than ever before, a clear message to forward-looking organisations that when service breaks down, recovery is everything. Fix it fast or risk losing customers forever.
Writer: Mohammed Ali
Features
… Steps to handle conflict at work- Final Part
Conflict at work is more common than you might think. According to 2022 research by The Myers-Briggs Company, more than a third of the workforce reports dealing with conflict often, very often, or all the time in the workplace.
Addressing a dispute might feel tense or awkward, but resolving the conflict is typically well worth it in the long run. Whether you are trying to mediate conflict between colleagues or are directly involved. Last week we looked at three and this week is the remaining four steps you can take to manage workplace conflict.
4. Find common ground
The best way to handle workplace conflict is to start with what you can agree on. Find common ground between the people engaging in conflict. If you are directly involved in the conflict, slow down and focus on results instead of who’s right.
If you are the mediator for conflict resolution between coworkers, observe the discussion and help point out the common ground others may not see.
5. Collectively brainstorm solutions
When deciding how to handle workplace conflict, it can be tempting to problem-solve on your own. Sometimes, it feels easier to work independently rather than collaboratively. However, if you want to achieve a lasting resolution, you will need to motivate your team to get involved.
Brainstorm possible solutions together, and solicit input from everyone involved on the pros and cons of each option until you settle on a solution that feels comfortable to everyone. This will help all team members feel a sense of ownership that can help prevent future conflicts.
6. Create an action plan
Once you have created an open dialogue around workplace conflicts, it is time to resolve them. Just like any other work goal, this requires creating a concrete plan and following through.
Create an action plan and then act on it. It does not matter what the plan is, as long as you commit to it and resolve the conflict as a result.
7. Reflect on what you learned
All conflicts offer an opportunity to grow and become a better communicator. Identify what went well and what did not.
Work with your whole team to gather learnings from the conflict so you can avoid similar situations in the future.
News3 days agoGhana’s Chris Koney participates in high-level dialogue at Africa Forward Summit 2026
News1 week agoIsaac Adongo defends BOG Governor, says Ghana “in safe hands”
Features3 days agoFix It Fast or Lose Them Forever: The Ever-Rising Importance of Service Recovery in Competitive Industries




