Connect with us

News

ORAL Committee presents report, with an estimated value of $20.49billion from 36 cases reviewed 

Published

on

Operation Recover All Loot (ORAL) Committee led by Foreign Affairs Minister, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa officially hands over investigative report to President yesterday. 

According to Okudzeto Ablakwa, 

ORAL can retrieve $20.49 billion with 36 cases.

The President handed over the re port to the Attorney General and Minister for Justice with a directive to immediately begin investigations into the committee’s findings.

Advertisement

He noted that the findings of the ORAL report call for sober reflection on the massive financial leakages that should have been invested in education, healthcare, infrastructure and social development.

“Ghana is no longer a safe haven for corruption. To those who stand for integrity, accountability, and the rule of law, I assure you that this government remains your steadfast pattern in building a nation where honesty and hard work are rewarded,” President John Mahama.

Presenting a summary of the findings, the Chairman of the Committee, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, also Ghana’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, said the value of thirty-six (36) financial cases reviewed is estimated at $20.49 billion.

According to a summary of the report, the cost of land cases alone is estimated at $702.8 million. Mr Ablakwa said the demining revelations vindicate President Mahama from critics of his resolve to pursue economic saboteurs.

Advertisement

The committee received 2,417 complaints in total, including 44 petitions received directly, 924 emails, and 1,493 phone calls.

By Edem Mensah-Tsotorme

News

Who will pay for expanded primaries?- Gary Nimako questions Supreme Court ruling

Published

on

The Director of Legal Affairs of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Gary Nimako Marfo, has questioned who will bear the cost of conducting presidential and parliamentary primaries following the Supreme Court’s ruling on the party’s delegate system.

Speaking to journalists, Mr. Nimako Marfo said he would not immediately comment on the ruling, adding that he wanted to wait for the full details before sharing his views.

“I don’t want to comment on it now. Let’s wait,” he said.

When asked about the Supreme Court’s decision that all members in good standing should vote in party elections, he shifted attention to the financial implications of implementing the ruling.

Advertisement

According to him, allowing all members in good standing to vote would increase the cost of organising internal party elections.

He questioned who would pay for the expanded electoral process.

“Who is going to pay for the cost of the elections?” he asked.

When a journalist suggested that political parties would bear the cost, Mr. Nimako Marfo replied, “Let’s wait and see.”

Advertisement

The comments come after the Supreme Court ruled that political parties should allow all members in good standing to vote in their internal elections, a decision that is expected to expand participation but also increase the financial and logistical demands of organising presidential and parliamentary primaries.

By: Jacob Aggrey

Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court declares political party delegates system unconstitutional

Published

on

The Supreme Court of Ghana has declared the delegate system used by political parties to elect presidential and parliamentary candidates unconstitutional.

In a 5-2 majority decision delivered, the Court ruled that the long-standing system violates democratic principles and ordered all political parties to ensure every registered, card-bearing member participates in presidential and parliamentary primaries.

The ruling brings to an end decades of internal party elections conducted by a limited number of delegates.

The suit was filed by former Minister for Environment, Science, Technology and Innovation, Professor Kwabena Frimpong-Boateng; veteran politician Dr. Nyaho Nyaho-Tamakloe; and former Minister for Lands and Forestry, Dr. Christine Amoako-Nuamah.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs argued that the delegate system created inequality among party members by granting voting rights to a privileged minority while excluding ordinary members in good standing.

They told the Court that restricting voting rights to delegates was inconsistent with the democratic principles enshrined in the 1992 Constitution.

The Attorney-General’s Department supported the suit and urged the Court to adopt a “one member, one vote” approach.

In its submission, the State argued that political parties perform an important public function in Ghana’s democratic framework and that their internal electoral processes must reflect constitutional values of equality, participation and universal suffrage.

Advertisement

The Attorney-General further submitted that expanding voting rights to all registered members would strengthen accountability and deepen internal democracy within political parties.

The judgment means that going forward, presidential and parliamentary candidates will be selected by all registered members of a political party, instead of by delegates alone.

Political parties are expected to review their constitutions and structures to comply with the Court’s directive ahead of the 2028 general elections.

By Edem Mensah-Tsotorme

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending