Connect with us

News

Truth and how it’s communicated

Published

on

There is an age-old question, the answer to which is earnestly important to all of us at all times: “What is truth?” There are those who would define it as a relative term—those who would say that what is commonly thought to be true by the constituted authorities of any particular time or place is true for that time or place.

• Truth is eternal

That is to say, what is generally believed to be true today is true for this day. But to say this is also to say that what was believed to be true yesterday was true yesterday.

In other words, if a man stands in the pulpit or at the marketplace or in the classroom and proclaims what he and his generation believe to be the truth, it is said by some that he is telling the truth. This sounds very plausible until we reduce it to specific cases. There was a generation that believed and proclaimed that the world was flat.

They were sincere in this belief, and they thought they were proclaiming truth, but that didn’t make the world flat, and the truth was and is that the world was not and is not flat. And so we could go on multiplying examples of what people have believed and have not believed, suddenly to come to the realisation that no matter what men at a given time happen to believe, if it isn’t true, their belief doesn’t make it true.

Truth cannot be made or unmade by arbitrary authority, nor by the belief or unbelief of any man or any generation of men. “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” But a falsehood or an error couldn’t make a man free. Indeed, it would shackle him with chains of ignorance. And so, we must come to the conclusion that truth is not an unpredictable variable but a determinable constant.

Advertisement

Popular conception of what constitutes truth can change, but not truth, for “truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come.” And it doesn’t matter where it is found or who discovers it, it is the common property of the whole universe.

Our knowledge of it may increase; our ignorance concerning it may be profound; our willingness or unwillingness to accept it may vary, but what is fundamentally true today will always be true.

Truth is eternal, and never shall we be called upon by that God whose glory is intelligence and whose first law is order, to discard any fragment of truth, scientific or religious or whatever men may call it, but assuredly we may expect to be called upon to discard a good many of our theories and opinions.

There is a sentence from one of the writings of Samuel Taylor Coleridge that suggests a deeply significant subject: “Veracity,” he said, “does not consist in saying, but in the intention of communicating truth.”Too often it is assumed that the truth has been told if someone simply says the right words.

Advertisement

Too often it is assumed that a person has told the truth when actually he has told a half-truth and withheld the other half.  But a person hasn’t told the truth when he has deliberately left a false impression, no matter what words he has used or how he has used them. 

Men may mislead other men by the inflection of their voices, by insinuation and innuendo, by gesture, by what they suggest rather than by what they say, and by what they leave unsaid.

They may say so much and imply much more, and then hide behind the literal limits of language.  In many such ways men frequently falsify and often we could not legally prove that they had perpetrated an untruth, yet morally we may know that they intended not to tell the truth.

 There are those who, as Isaiah indicts them, “Make a man an offender for a word”those who resort to slick, legal loopholes, those who insincerely rely upon the letter of the law and ignore every intention of honour and honesty.

Advertisement

Words can be wonderful, but whatever our words we shall ultimately have to answer for the broad intent of our actions and utterances not merely for legal terminology or technicalities, not merely for the letter of the law.

The whole intent of a man, what he means to do and what he means not to do, what he means to say and what he means not to say, what he thinks in his heart, what he is in, his soul, are all involved in “telling” the truth; for which we are all accountable before our fellow men and before our eternal Father.

God grant that in our time we may hear and know and speak and write and live the truth, not rely on tricky technicalities or, legal loopholes or ambiguous utterance that is a mere mask for falsehood. 

To close with the words with which we opened: “Veracity does not consist in saying, but in the intention of communicating truth.”The mere appearance of truthfulness is not enough.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

‘Be tactful, responsible with Xenophobia, Galamsey crisis to ensure peace in Africa’

Published

on

• Rt Rev. Mrs Grace Frimpong Boateng
• Rt Rev. Mrs Grace Frimpong Boateng

A minister of the gospel, Rt Rev. Mrs Grace Frimpong Boateng, has appealed for calm in the midst of attacks on Ghanaians and Africans in general in South Africa and concerns about illegal mining (Galamsey) in Ghana.

The respected Ghanaian minister who continues to impact lives through her teachings, prophetic ministry, and community outreach efforts, said though reports on the two subject matter were nothing to be enthused about, it was important that leadership approaches them in a calm manner.

Delivering a sermon at the recently held ‘Super Mega Watch Night Service’ held at the Jesus Prayer Ministry in Kumasi, she stated that the South Africa Xenophobia and the ‘Galamsey’ were global matters with spiritual basis.

According to her, the behaviour of South Africans may be coming to a lot of people on the African continent and the world at large may be coming as a huge surprise because of their past.

Advertisement

“This is a country the world showed solidarity in the period of oppression-apartheid. Ghanaians were with them; so was the entire globe. It is, therefore strange that the same people would rise against their fellow Africans. Despite this, African leaders must be calm in dealing with the issues,” she told the congregation.

“That notwithstanding, we must promote peace and unity at all times. The world once stood with South Africa, and this is a moment for South Africans to show love, peace, calm to Ghanaians and other people; this is the time for  togetherness,” she stated.

Commenting on galamsey, Rev Mrs Boateng said it remains Ghana’s biggest environmental and challenge and reflects prophetic warnings she had previously shared concerning the destruction of natural resources.

Galamsey activities have for years contributed to the destruction of forests and pollution of major water bodies, raising national concern and prompting government interventions such as task forces to combat the menace.

Advertisement

She emphasised that continued environmental destruction could lead to serious consequences if not addressed, urging both leaders and citizens to act responsibly.

Many attendees described the service as timely and impactful, noting that her message combined spiritual insight with national and international relevance.

The minister is widely known for her commitment to faith-based initiatives and community development, with organisers indicating that more impactful programmes were expected in the coming months.

By Spectator Reporter

Advertisement

Continue Reading

News

Pass clearer property law for spouses …AWLA urges government

Published

on

Ms Effiba Amihere [middle] with some members of the Association after press conference Photo Okai Elizabeth.

A group of female lawyers known as the African Women Lawyers Association (AWLA) is calling on the Parliament of Ghana to urgently pass a comprehensive law on spousal property rights to eliminate ambiguity and ensure fairness in divorce settlements.

Among the rights proposed were a clearer definition of marital property, formal recognition of non-monetary contributions, stronger guidelines for judges, improved enforcement of court orders and expanded access to legal aid for vulnerable spouses.

This, the group underlined, would cure the inconsistent court rulings that continue to leave many divorced spouses, particularly women, trapped in uncertainty, injustice and often left with nothing or something insignificant after years of marriage.

Addressing journalists at a press briefing in Accra on Monday, the Executive Director of AWLA, Ms Effiba Amihere, said although the Supreme Court had over the years laid down important legal principles on the sharing of marital properties, conflicting judgments had created confusion and frustration for families seeking justice after divorce.

Advertisement

She explained that while some rulings recognised marriage as an economic partnership where both financial and non-financial contributions should be valued equally, others demanded proof of direct monetary contributions before property could be shared fairly.

This contradiction in the law, she said, had left many spouses vulnerable, especially women whose years of unpaid domestic work often went unrecognised in courtrooms.

“There are women who spend decades building homes, raising children, supporting businesses and sacrificing careers, only to walk away from marriages with little or nothing because their contribution cannot be measured in cash,” she stressed.

She argued that certain rulings appeared to rely on irrelevant considerations such as a spouse’s appearance, lifestyle or level of financial independence instead of established legal principles.

Advertisement

Ms Amihere, however, praised a landmark Supreme Court decision on July 17, 2025, which she described as a major step towards fairness and clarity in family law.

The ruling outlined important guidelines for courts in determining how marital properties should be shared after divorce and factors to be considered.

The ruling captured the duration of the marriage, the acquisition of property, financial contributions, pre-marital assets, debts, as well as non-financial contributions such as childcare, housekeeping, emotional support and domestic labour.

The judgment, she praised, was particularly significant because it openly acknowledged the economic value of unpaid domestic work, an area she said had long been ignored despite sustaining countless households across the country.

Advertisement

She maintained that Ghanaian courts had already affirmed that marriage was a joint enterprise and that contribution should not be reduced to money alone.

The organisation also appealed to the Office of the Attorney General and Ministry of Justice, the Judiciary of Ghana and the Ghana Bar Association to support reforms aimed at protecting spouses and strengthening justice in family law cases.

By Esinam Jemima Kuatsinu

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending