Connect with us

News

Finance Ministry fails to account for ABFA for 3rd time – PIAC

Published

on

The Ministry of Finance has for the third consecutive year failed to account for unutilised Annual Budget Funding Amount (ABFA) of oil revenues,the Public Interest and Accountability Committee (PIAC) has disclosed.

In its 2019 annual report on the management and use of petroleum revenues launched in Accra yesterday, the committee revealed that the amount stood at GH¢1.5 billion at the end of 2019.

The ministry was also cited for violating portions of the Petroleum Revenue Management Act (PRMA) 893 and Ghana Investment Infrastructure Fund (GIIF) Act 877.

The Chairman of the Committee, Mr Noble Wadzah has therefore urged parliament to bring its oversight mandate to bear on the ministry’s “impunity and failure for not accounting for unutilised ABFA” and other violations.

Advertisement

The 2019 PIAC Report covering the period January to December, encompasses issues including the management and utilisation of petroleum revenues and findings pertinent to the performance of various institutions in the sector.

It is inline of PIAC’s statutory obligation under the Petroleum Revenue Management (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Act 893), which enjoins PIAC to publish reports to keep the citizenry updated on petroleum revenue and solicit feedback.

Giving highlights of key findings of the report, Mr Wadzah said the total ABFA available for spending last year was GH¢2.7 billion  out of which GH¢1.2billion  was utilised leaving a balance of GH¢1.5 to be utilised and accounted for.

“For the third consecutive year, not only has a sizeable proportion of the ABFA not been fully utilised but it has not been accounted for, impeding PIAC’s appreciation of the full scope of accounting to the public on the utilisation of our petroleum revenues “, he said.

Advertisement

In the same period, he disclosed that 45.14 per cent of the actual ABFA was spent on recurrent expenditure, with 54.86 per cent on capital expenditure in violation of Section 8(4) (a) of Act 893 which required that a minimum of 70 per cent be spent on public investment expenditure. 

Additionally, he said for the second consecutive year, “there was no allocation from the ABFA to the Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund (GIIF), contrary to the provisions of the PRMA and GIIF Act 877.”

The PIAC report reiterated its call on Parliament to restrict portions of the    Ghana National Petroleum Corporation’s (GNPC) corporate social responsibility (CSR) and guarantees to state institutions, especially since the corporation was unable to respond to some of its cash calls.

It disclosed that the corporation provided guarantees amounting to US$645.5 million to state-owned enterprises (SOEs) last year and was almost double, compared with the previous years’ guarantees while it outweighed its total equity financing expenditure of US$164.79 million for the period.

Advertisement

“GNPC’s expenditure on Corporate Social Initiatives (CSI) remains high, increasing from GH¢41.49 million in 2018 to GH¢49.98 million in 2019”, the report stated.

The report also asked the government to address the indebtedness of the Ghana National Gas Corporation as it was unable to pay $334.6 million worth of raw gas received from GNPC, largely due to Volta River Authority’s debt.

The report revealed that US$925.04 million was disbursed from the Petroleum Holding Fund for the period under review, constituting a decrease of 5.33 per cent from that of 2018, and 14.41 per cent less than projected for 2019.

On production, the report said, a total of 71.4 million barrels of oil was obtained from the three production fields, exceeding 2018 production by 15 per cent   while gas production shot up by 85 per cent to 169,508.61 million standard cubic feet of gas.

Advertisement

The President of the Ghana Journalist Association (GJA) Roland Affail Monney, commended PIAC for keeping Ghanaians up to speed about the oil sector and urged it to continue living up to expectation.

Source: Ghanaian Times

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Police arrest former boxer Ayitey Powers over alleged death threat on NSA boss

Published

on

The Accra Regional Police Command has arrested former professional boxer Michael Ayitey Okai, popularly known as “Ayitey Powers,” over an alleged threat of death against the Director-General of the National Sports Authority, Yaw Ampofo.

According to the Police, the 46-year-old former boxer was arrested on Monday, August 24, 2026, in connection with the alleged threat.

The Police said the arrest followed a video circulating on social media in which Ayitey Powers is alleged to have issued the threat against Mr Ampofo.

He is currently in Police custody and is assisting with investigations.

Advertisement

The Accra Regional Police Command said investigations are ongoing to establish the circumstances surrounding the alleged threat and determine the appropriate action to be taken in accordance with the law.

The Command has urged the public to refrain from sharing unverified information about the matter while the investigation continues.

By: Jacob Aggrey

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Afenyo Markin sues Sammy Gyamfi, Multimedia for alleged defamation

Published

on

Minority Leader in Parliament Alexander Afenyo Markin has sued the Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Sammy Gyamfi, and Multimedia Group Limited over alleged defamatory comments made against him on the Newsfile programme.

In a writ filed at the High Court in Accra, Mr Afenyo Markin is seeking GH¢15 million in damages, an apology and retraction of the statements, among other reliefs.

The suit follows comments allegedly made by Mr Gyamfi during the Saturday, August 22, 2026 edition of Newsfile, hosted by Samson Lardy Anyenini.

According to the statement of claim, Mr Gyamfi described Mr Afenyo Markin as an “extortionist” while responding to a question about GoldBod’s reported profits and its position on losses arising from its operations.

Advertisement

The plaintiff claims that Mr Gyamfi repeated the allegation when the host sought clarification on whether he stood by the description.

Mr Afenyo Markin further claims that Mr Gyamfi challenged him to sue him and insisted that the allegation was true.

The plaintiff argues that the statements created the impression that he engages in extortion, uses his political influence to put improper pressure on public institutions and officials, and conducts himself in a manner inconsistent with the standards expected of a lawyer and public office holder.

He denies the allegations and maintains that he is not an extortionist and has never engaged in the conduct alleged by Mr Gyamfi.

Advertisement

The Minority Leader also argues that the comments were made maliciously and were presented as facts without evidence being disclosed.

He claims the statements have damaged his reputation, professional standing and public image, particularly because of his position as a senior political figure and legal practitioner.

The suit also names Multimedia Group Limited as a defendant because, according to the plaintiff, the alleged defamatory comments were broadcast through JoyNews and subsequently circulated on social media platforms, including X, Facebook and YouTube.

Mr Afenyo Markin claims Multimedia failed to stop the comments or deactivate Mr Gyamfi’s microphone after the allegations were made.

Advertisement

He is therefore asking the court to award him general, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as GH¢15 million in compensation and legal costs.

He is also seeking an order compelling the defendants to issue a full, unconditional and unequivocal retraction and public apology.

The plaintiff wants the apology and retraction to be given similar prominence and reach as the original publication, including through JoyNews and the social media platforms where the comments were disseminated.

He is further seeking a permanent injunction preventing the defendants from repeating the alleged defamatory statements or words with a similar meaning.

Advertisement

The writ requires the defendants to enter an appearance within eight days after being served.

It warns that failure to do so could result in judgment being entered in their absence.

The case was filed by lawyer Paa Kwesi Abaidoo of Dehyena Chambers on behalf of Mr Afenyo Markin.

By: Jacob Aggrey

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending