Connect with us

Features

TUC: Still standing accused?

Published

on

Dr Anthony Yaw Baah Pix

• Dr Anthony Yaw Baah, TUC General Secretary

Readers, about two months ago, a very concerned Labour Consultant and Member of the Ghana Association of Certified Mediators and Arbitrators, Mr Seth Abloso, wrote a detailed petition to the Secretary General of the Trades Union Congress of Ghana (TUC), reporting the criminal conduct of two “unfit” persons nominated by the TUC to represent Oganised Labour on the Boards of Trustees of the Social Security and National Insurance Trust (SSNIT) and the National Pensions Regulatory Authority (NPRA).

• Mr Seth Abloso, Labour Consultant

Indeed, the petition was titled:” Petition for the withdrawal of unfit persons as representatives of Oganised Labour on the Boards of Trustees of the Social Security and National Insurance Trust and the National Pensions Regulatory Authority.”

The petition was copied to: (a) Member Unions of Organised Labour (b) the Governor of the Bank of Ghana (c) the Managing Director of GCB Bank LLC (d) the Chief Labour Officer (e) the Director General – SSNIT (f) the Chief Executive Officer – NPRA (g) the Executive Secretary – Ghana Anti-Corruption Coalition (h) the Executive Director – Ghana Integrity Initiative and the two “unfit” persons.

The petition named the two “unfit” persons as John Senanu Amagashie, General Secretary of the Union of Industry, Commerce and Finance Workers (UNICOF) and Alex Nyarku-Opoku, who doubles as National Chairman of UNICOF and a Manager of the Burma Camp branch of GCB Bank LLC.  Mr Nyarku-Opoku is also the Chairman of the General Council of the TUC.

Advertisement

Mr Abloso’s petition to the TUC Secretary General was fully highlighted by this column in the May 21, 2022 edition of The Spectator, and readers may refer to it.

In simple language, the petition was asking the TUC to replace the two “unfit” TUC nominees on SSNIT and NPRA Boards with new nominees, who are fit to represent Organised Labour on the two Boards.

Deeply reflecting on the criminal charges characterising the two “unfit” persons in Mr Abloso’s petition to the leadership of the TUC, one would have expected an institution like the TUC, to have responded to the petition to redeem its “infested” image in the matter but it has still not done that.

Lawyers for the two “unfit” persons have, however, written to Mr Abloso, asking him to “retract” what they claim as “defamatory and libellous statements” against their clients, as contained in his petition, besides rendering an apology.

Advertisement

The letter from the law firm (Law Alert Group) representing the two “unfit” persons, dated 10th June, 2022, was signed by Charles Bawaduah Esq. The letter warned Mr  Abloso , stressing that within two weeks after the receipt of the letter, a legal action would be instituted against him if a “retraction” and an “apology” had not been rendered.

Having received the letter from the law firm on 22nd June 2022, Mr Abloso responded appropriately to it, re-affirming all the statements he made in his petition to the TUC leadership and further expatiated them.

Mr Abloso’s letter to the Law Alert Group, defending his statements on the two “unfit” persons makes very interesting reading.

His letter to the lawyers dated 30th June, 2022, emphatically stated: “The issues at stake are matters of public record and same have not been challenged in any way by Mr Alex Nyarku-Opoku and Mr John Senanu Amagashie and UNICOF.

Advertisement

“As matters stand now, Section 177(1) (c) of the Company Act, 2019 (ACT 992) remains relevant and indisputable.  The unfit persons need to withdraw, be withdrawn or be restrained from being part of the Management or Directorship of any Company, whether limited by shares or limited by guarantee.

“Alternatively, I invite your clients to a joint verification of the records within one (1) week upon receipt of this letter, which outcome should conclude this matter and I await their favourable response to the request for verification.

“My request for Organised Labour through the Secretary General of the TUC to cause the withdrawal of Mr Nyarku-Opoku and Mr Senanu Amagashie from the Board of Directors of NPRA and the Board of Trustees of SSNIT, as Organised Labour representatives is based on the decisions of the High Court and records of the Judicial Service of Ghana, which are matters in the public domain and are not a fabrication.

“Mr Nyarku-Opoku was found by the ruling of the National Labour Commission (NLC) of 2nd June, 2017, to have lied on oath. The High Court affirmed this decision on 24th June, 2019, which has been acknowledged by him, rendering it as self-confessed misconduct.

Advertisement

“This alone renders him unfit to hold a position in the Union of Industry, Commerce and Finance Workers (UNICOF) , let alone in the TUC ,  and how much more to serve on a Public Board?

“He,  together with Mr Amagashie, among others, were found by the NLC and the High Court decisions to have multiple breaches of the UNICOF  Constitution, including perpetuating administrative and adjudicative injustice, and by the same Constitution they were debarred from holding any elective office in the UNICOF , having accepted their guilt of breach of the Union’s Constitution, but defiantly and illegally staying on , despite cherished principle that nobody should benefit from breaching the law.

“So, how did they get into the structures of the TUC and get appointed as Board Member of NPRA and SSNIT, representing Organised Labour ?

“The TUC Secretary General knew or ought to have known that the said individuals were unfit and should not have entertained their nomination for consideration to the said Boards.

Advertisement

“In fact, the logical expectation was that upon receipt of my letter identifying them as unfit for purpose, Mr Nyarku-Opoku and Mr Senanu Amagashie should have resigned on their own accord to relieve the Secretary General  and Organised Labour of the burden of recalling them

“The loan facility with GCB Bank which enumerated their prowess in deceiving the Bank to obtain a loan was put in public domain when UNICOF instructed same to be filed at the High Court in suit No. MSIL/03/2019.

“In the said loan facility agreement signed by the two unfit persons, they submitted that there was no litigation or arbitration proceedings taking place,  pending or threatening against the UNICOF or its assets, which may have material adverse effect on its business, assets or financial position, knowing very well that this declaration is a blatant falsehood as Suit No. MSIL/03/2019, NLC vrs UNICOF was ongoing at the High Court, Accra.

“These pieces of information are public and verifiable. Your letter did not state the individuals had commenced or completed any processes to purge themselves of their unlawful conduct per the NLC ruling and their making false claims to obtain a loan on behalf of UNICOF from the GCB Bank.

Advertisement

“Mr Nyarku-Opoku and Mr Senanu Amagashie appear to be embroiled in another case bordering on fraud, which is also before the courts in Suit No. GJ/0226/2021.

“In this case, UNICOF under the supervision of the same individuals, has admitted to procuring , in other words, engineered the stealing of a GCB Bank customer’s Statement of Account, which wrong doing, according to the Bank, Mr Nyarku-Opoku has owned up being the one from whom UNICOF obtained the said stolen document. This is a criminal misconduct, which I cannot be convinced is befitting of a Board Member.

“However, by your letter Mr Nyarku-Opoku and Mr Senanu Amagashie are telling the people of Ghana, especially members,  contributors and beneficiaries of SSNIT and the Pensions Schemes as well as business community that despite their lead roles in the above  fraudulent incidents, they are fit to represent Organised Labour as Board Members of SSNIT and NPRA ?

“The leadership of Organised Labour and the TUC Secretary General’s silence and inaction in immediately withdrawing them from the Boards appear to be tacitly supporting and or covering up their misconduct and thereby tainting the image and credibility of the Boards.”

Advertisement

Readers, from Mr Abloso’s detailed response to the lawyers of the two “unfit” persons on the Boards of SSNIT and the NPRA;  is the TUC leadership still justified in pretending to be “deaf and dumb” over the whole issue ?

Contact email/ WhatsApp of author:

asmahfrankg@gmail.com (0505556179)

By G. Frank Asmah

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Features

The eye is indeed the lamp of the body

Published

on

There is a scripture that is found in Matthew 6:22 which says that the lamp of the body is the eye and therefore the eye must see well to enable the body to get to its destination.  

What most people do not know is that behind the scenes, there is a strong interaction between the eyes and the brain before a picture becomes clear.  The state of mind therefore is crucial to the eye seeing clearly to enable the body to process accurately the information the eyes are feeding it for proper identification of what the eyes see. 

This is similar to how a person behaves i.e. what informs the decisions that forms in the mind that results in the actions that a person performs.  The actions of a person does not therefore just happen but is as a result of things that went on in the mind, which in most cases resulted from information passed on to it by the eyes either consciously or unconsciously.

There are so many issues that affect our society which makes one wonder, whether the people who displayed such acts were created by someone or something other than God. 

Advertisement

How can a person see a beach created by God with beautiful beaches and fresh air blowing all around, decides to defecate at such places, and therefore desecrate the environment?  lt is simply mind boggling? 

When other people in other countries who dwell on the coast are using their beaches for tourist attraction purposes as a means of livelihood and also to promote environmental health, some people living around our beaches, have turned them into rubbish dumping sites and toilets. 

It is a very sad situation and the earlier we did something about it the better.  It is a national emergency that must engage the attention, first of the government and then the citizenry, where religious bodies and NGOs must play a critical role.

The things we focus on in this country, needs to be addressed.  Our minds which processes the info the eyes send to the brain, must be disciplined.  There are certain behaviours that a disciplined mind can ignore even when the eye has provided info to the brain.  One of the things a disciplined mind does, is the avoidance of a second look, which is critical for every person who wants to avoid adultery or fornication. 

Advertisement

Once a person is not blind, he will see things.  The boobs, the ‘shankus’, the coca cola shapes, the light complexioned, the dark complexioned etc. the eyes will definitely see and report same to the brain.  What the brain or the mind decides to do or instructs the eye to do is the issue. 

It can decide to instruct the eye to take a second look and let the mind drool over it or say ignore it and that will be the end.

If the mind becomes trained to focus on environmental issues like clean environment, the eyes will automatically be reporting on insanitary conditions to the brain as and when it sees them.  The mind will pay attention to such data and begin to process them and to identify solutions to deal with the reported insanitary conditions. 

There is the need to encourage citizens to train the mind to focus on the right thing so that in tandem with the eyes, focus will be maintained.  When the mind is so trained, it communicates with the eye to also focus on hood things that helps in both are spiritual life and our secular lives, for indeed the eyes are the lamp of the body.  God bless.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Features

 Arming the Sikaman journalists to the teeth

Published

on

THE relationship between New Times Corporation (NTC) and African Concrete Productions (ACP) is based entirely on matters of the stomach. Each depends on the other in a dietary symbiosis, reinforced by the close proximity of each other

At lunchtime, you’d see a particular set of Times workers marching regimentally to ACP to face the wall. You’d think they are soldiers. It has long been declared that the company manufactures the best kokonte in the Greater Accra Region. ACP is, therefore, a culinary haven for those NTC kokonte fans, both male and female.

As the NTC kokonte warriors cross the border to ACP, you’d see some ACP banku fanatics dancing joyously to NTC. They are lucky folks because they do not have to obtain visa to enter into ‘Times’ to attack the balls of banku with precision and accuracy. They also claim that the lightsoup at ‘Times’ is arguably the best in West Africa.

So the relationship between the two entities was quite cordial and based practically on stomach palaver, until ACP workers staged an industrial revolution, whereupon the managing director, accountant and estate manager were allegedly stripped naked and locked up in a room. An insurgency had began in earnest.

An ACP worker came to ‘Times’, this time not to eat banku and okro. He had come to inform newsmen that juicy stuff awaited them at ACP. It could make a front page lead story.

Advertisement

A camerawoman and a female reporter were accordingly dispatched to go and bring back news, juicy news as juicy as kokonte and groundnut soup.

Sikaman Palava
Sikaman Palava

I was driving to work when I espied the familiar camerawoman clicking away outside the ACP premises. I didn’t see any ‘Times’ reporter but angry workers who were on the verge of getting violent. I slowed down and the driver behind blew his horn at me like a lunatic. I drove on.

Later, I heard the reporter and camerawoman were harassed and brutalised. The report came,. “The camerawoman, Mrs Salome Adonu-Agbottah and reporter Mrs Doreen Allotey, in an attempt to retrieve the camera which the workers had seized from them were severely beaten. They were manhandled and almost pushed into a big gutter opposite the company’s premises.

BRUISES

“….The camerawoman had bruises on her body, her hand bag was destroyed and the money in it stolen. Mrs Allotey’s watch was also snatched and her feet stamped on.”

Advertisement

Luckily, it was not her nose that was trampled upon. She has a beautiful nose.

The bad news was received with extreme sorrow. If the victims had been men, it would not have seemed too bad. But to brutalise women is just unacceptable. The New Times Corporation has not stopped mourning the incident which has been condemned in many circles.

Some people keep asking me why Times sent females to cover a potentially violent demonstration. I tell them they might as well ask why CNN’s amazon, Christina Amanpour, is assigned to cover the carnage in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Rwanda. She is always on the frontline in jeans and jacket.

Journalism is a potentially hazardous profession, and once you accept to study and practise the trade, you might as well bone up to face any assignment as long as your superiors feel you are capable of handling it or you have demonstrated the capacity to handle it. Both males and females can be assigned anywhere, anytime just like policemen and women are assigned.

Advertisement

The only difference between cops and pressmen is that the latter are armed only with a pen and the former with a gun. The question is should newsmen also arm themselves so that in any event of an assault they would not be found wanting in self-defence? They can’t adequately defend themselves with a pen and a jotter. A pen cannot even disfigure an opponent’s upper lip.

Photo-journalists have particularly suffered violence. Spectator ace-cameraman Vincent Dzatse was severely assaulted by AMA men when he attempted to take pictures of their indiscretions.

Sports cameraman, P. K. Arthur has been beaten more than once at the sports stadium when riots errupted and he wanted to capture it on his lenses.

Some sports journalists have been banned from entering the Accra Sports Stadium by supporters because in their comments, they didn’t write “sense”. Some supporters once nearly lynched Christian Abbew, Spectator Sports Editor, near a courtroom. He was stoned like the biblical Stephen. He had gone to defend a contempt charge.

Advertisement

I think it is time journalists met and discussed how best to defend themselves in any event of an attack by individuals or mobs. In the pursuance of their duty, they must be free from harassment and assault.

Some journalists go to work and return home with a black-eye or a double fore-head. It is just not right. Something has to be done about it. I think journalists should be armed. But first we must be trained in the use of firearms so that our warning shot do not hit below the belt. What about training in Kung Fu?

This article was first published on Saturday, October 17, 1998.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending