News
Samson’s Take: Punish the criminal ‘vigilante’ takeovers

- /home/u249204778/domains/spectator.com.gh/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://spectator.com.gh/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/WhatsApp-Image-2025-01-13-at-11.28.38-AM-914x600.jpeg&description=Samson’s Take: Punish the criminal ‘vigilante’ takeovers', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/u249204778/domains/spectator.com.gh/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://spectator.com.gh/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/WhatsApp-Image-2025-01-13-at-11.28.38-AM-914x600.jpeg&description=Samson’s Take: Punish the criminal ‘vigilante’ takeovers', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
Ghana has a law called the Presidential (Transition) Act, 2012 (Act 845). It was passed to regulate the political transfer of power after an election. This became necessary because party foot-soldiers, in fact, so-called big men in the NDC and NPP appear to lose their sense of civility and patience to follow the law even to take over management of public toilets and tollbooths.
It is also the case that some political appointees, thieves, provoke the party thugs, wrongly labelled as vigilante groups. There have been allegations of destruction of documents and concealment of all sorts of things to cover up wrongdoing.
Yes, even high-rank officials faced unusual accusations of stealing fittings including carpets, and the famous and politically connected caught allegedly changing the identity of an expensive state vehicle in a garage in order to keep it. In 2017, the NPP-affiliated Delta and Invisible forces besieged offices and openly terrorised their victims. They even attacked a court to free their members standing trial but were treated with kid gloves for felonies.
The rampaging foot-soldiers invaded and locked up offices at the Tema Port and in other regions. The NDC thugs are visiting same places today. We were told to shut up when we condemned the criminal conduct. Party Chairman, a trained lawyer who had risen to become a Deputy Speaker of Parliament while an MP joined rather reckless leaders and members in defending the thuggery. “They are defending state property” – we were told by Freddy Blay. One other chairman of the party, Kwame Baffoe – alias Abronye led a team to seize cars on official instructions from the Jubilee House.
The NDC whose officials suffered the indignities are today encouraging and sponsoring the same wrong. The party thugs are all over the place and in some cases led by a party chairman, Joseph Yamin, to disrupt and imperil legitimate and official gold transactions.
They are locking up offices and official residences. In the Oti Region, they mistook three Catholic priests, (missionaries from India) for thieving public officers and beat them mercilessly on completely false allegations.
It is surprising these people who were later led by party officials to apologise have not been arrested to stand trial.
These thugs do not have to bear names like the Azorka Boys or Delta Force (supposedly disbanded) before they can be dealt with by the State. It is not only group conduct in vigilantism that is criminal in Ghana, their very acts are proscribed by the Vigilantism Act, 2019. Threat of harm, threat of death, assault, trespass and damage to property are all arrestable offences in Ghana. So, why are the police looking on and acting helpless despite complaints by NPP officials?
President John Mahama has issued a general condemnation of these acts, but that’s not enough. Sir, call the Yamins, the Basintales and their boys by name and it might bring the results we seek – an end to the impunity.
In 2017, I was the lawyer for Kofi Adams when they unlawfully invaded the privacy of his home and drove away his cars without basis. I have represented YEA staff employed under NPP who got sacked when the NDC took over. I have also represented YEA staff employed under NDC who were sacked when the NPP came into office. I have done the same for high-rank officers upon change in government. Just when will the silly circus end?
By section 14 of the transition law, the following appointees lose their jobs upon a change in government:
i. The persons holding office under the Presidential Office Act, 1993 (Act 463)
ii. Ministers and Deputy Ministers of State.
iii. Regional and Deputy Regional Ministers of State.
iv. Special Assistants, Special Aides to the President, to the Vice-President and to the Ministers of State, Deputy Ministers, Regional Ministers and Deputy Regional Ministers
v. Non-career Ambassadors and High Commissioners.
vi. Persons appointed by the President or a Minister of State as members of Statutory Boards and Corporations.
But in January 2017, Godwin Edudzi Tamekloe led his friend Theophilus Donkor to the Supreme Court and got the court to give a narrow reprieve for heads of public corporations, statutory boards and authorities – that is, they can only be removed in accordance with the terms of their contracts and law, specifically articles 195 and 191.
In Part II, next week, I will speak about how to effect responsible and lawful citizens’ arrest of suspected looters of state property and wrongdoers during such transitions. I shall also stress the need to resource the office of the Administrator-General and Estate Unit as part of effective measures to end the recurring violent takeovers.
And that is My Take.
Samson Lardy ANYENINI
January 11, 2025
News
NPP condemns acquittal of former MASLOC CEO Sedinam Tamakloe Attionu

The New Patriotic Party (NPP) has strongly criticised the decision of the Court of Appeal to acquit and discharge former Chief Executive Officer of the Microfinance and Small Loans Centre (MASLOC), Sedinam Christine Tamakloe Attionu.
In a statement issued on July 30, 2026, the party described the ruling as a “travesty of justice” and claimed it was politically motivated.
The Court of Appeal on Thursday overturned her conviction and 10-year prison sentence, which had been imposed by the High Court in April 2024 on charges including stealing, causing financial loss to the state, money laundering and breaches of the Public Procurement Act.
According to the NPP, the former MASLOC boss was tried for five years and convicted after the High Court examined evidence relating to alleged financial irregularities during her tenure between 2013 and 2016.
The party noted that she left Ghana while the trial was ongoing and was later extradited from the United States, arriving in Ghana on June 9, 2026.
The NPP argued that the trial court had found that her actions caused a loss of nearly GH¢90 million to the state and that the evidence against her was substantial.
It questioned why the conviction was overturned barely seven weeks after her return to Ghana.
The party further accused the Attorney-General of using state institutions to protect people connected to the governing party.
It claimed that several cases involving persons affiliated with the government had been discontinued since January 2025 and that the acquittal of Madam Tamakloe Attionu was part of that pattern.
The NPP linked the decision to the ongoing case involving its Ashanti Regional Chairman, Bernard Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi.
It called for his immediate acquittal and discharge, arguing that his conviction was also politically motivated.
The party demanded that the Attorney-General publish details of all cases involving persons linked to the governing party that have been withdrawn, discontinued or otherwise terminated since January 2025, including the reasons for those decisions.
It called on the Judicial Council and the leadership of the Judiciary to take steps to restore public confidence in the justice system.
The NPP said it would pursue all lawful avenues, including a possible review at the Supreme Court where applicable, to ensure accountability in cases involving public funds.
The party maintained that the fight against corruption must not be selective and that public resources belong to all Ghanaians.
By: Jacob Aggrey
News
Godfred Dame disagrees with Sedina Tamakloe acquittal, urges Attorney-General to appeal

Former Attorney-General Godfred Yeboah Dame has disagreed with the Court of Appeal’s decision to acquit former MASLOC Chief Executive Officer Sedina Tamakloe Attionu, insisting that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Mr Dame made the remarks after the Court of Appeal unanimously overturned her conviction and 10-year prison sentence.
He maintained that the evidence presented by the prosecution during the trial was credible and sufficient to support the conviction.
According to him, Ms Tamakloe absconded after she had been confronted with evidence led by the prosecution.
Mr Dame questioned the basis for the acquittal and suggested that the current Attorney-General should explain what led to the Court of Appeal’s decision.
He wondered whether the appeal had been strongly opposed by the state.
When asked whether he would advise the Attorney-General to challenge the ruling, Mr Dame answered in the affirmative.
“Oh, definitely,” he stated.
The former Attorney-General spoke about the ongoing criminal case involving former Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta.
He indicated that an application for stay of proceedings filed at the High Court had been dismissed, and that a fresh application had been filed at the Court of Appeal.
Mr Dame argued that the charge sheet in the case was defective and that the appellate court should determine the issue before the trial proceeds.
He further criticised the decision to hear the case during the legal vacation, describing it as an “unjustified haste” and saying such trials had not been conducted during vacation periods in the past.
Mr Dame said his legal team would formally protest the directive allowing the case to proceed during the vacation.
The Court of Appeal’s ruling in favour of Ms Tamakloe has become a major legal and political issue, with the Attorney-General’s Department already announcing plans to appeal the decision at the Supreme Court.
By: Jacob Aggrey








