Connect with us

Features

Correcting some doctrinal misconceptions

Published

on

 This  week I have a very strong desire to talk about the things of God and therefore the Bible. There are a whole lot of misinter­pretation going about in the world as far as the Bible, which is the Word of God, is concerned.

One of the easiest jobs that does not require a licence to get into, is the Pastoral vocation. In this country all you need is a loud voice and even if you do not have, you can seek the aid of a loudspeaker to preach.

Again, one does not have to sit for any exams and all you need to do is to talk to Headmaster of one of the numerous JHS, get a classroom, get a couple of young ladies who have melodious voices and you are good to go.

As a result, we have all manner of people with very questionable characters parading about as Pastors, a.k.a., Men of God. Again, because titles are not something we purchase, they pick all manner of titles after getting a few congregation and trans­ferring the church from a classroom to a structure of their own.

Advertisement

Suddenly they become Bishop after initial title of Prophet and as some­one said they butcher the scriptures like nobody’s business. We have an interesting country.

One of the misconceptions is the question of whether the Bible endors­es the consumption of Alcohol or not. In the Old Testament which is basi­cally a manual for the relationship between God and his people, Israel, drinking of alcoholic beverages was not forbidden.

However, there was a particular group of people, who were forbidden to consume alcoholic beverages. In Leviticus 10:9-10, God specifically gave a decree for the High Priesthood Order to follow that is, they were to abstain from alcohol throughout the generations.

When we come to the New Testa­ment, the Bible makes it clear to us that, every believer is regarded as a High Priest and therefore a member of the High Priesthood order who are to abstain from strong drink, i.e. alcoholic drink.

Advertisement

A careful study of the Bible, leads one to conclude that Christians are to shun alcoholic drink because our bod­ies now houses the Spirit of God just like the Tabernacle in Old Testament so we should not contaminate it with unholy things.

There is another issue that raises a lot of argument in Christian circles. The issue of Tithe is a very topical issue that is gainng attention in this era if social media.

Some Christians believe that Tithe is an Old Testament thing and there­fore should not be countenanced in the New Testament era.

To really understand what Tithe is, we need to go to Genesis 14:20 where Tithe originated. It was a sacrifice initiated by Patriarch Abra­ham that was motivated by the Spirit of God after God had given him a mighty victory in battle.

Advertisement

It therefore became a practice among the descendants of Abraham. God endorsed its observance after the Commandments were given to Moses and was among other reasons to serve as a means for taking care of the needs of the Levites the Priests.

In Malachi God instituted it as an ordinance for generations to come cautioning noncompliance and spec­ifying blessings that will follow its observance. In the New Testament, it was mainly practised as an offering on a weekly basis by the early church and it was received by the leaders, every first day of the week according to 1 Corinthians 16:2.

I intend to periodically attempt to address certain issues that appear controversial in the Bible gradually, we shall have a clearer understand­ing to enrich our knowledge of the Bible.

NB: ‘CHANGE KOTOKA INTERNA­TIONAL AIRPORT TO KOFI BAAKO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT’

Advertisement

By Laud Kissi-Mensah

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Features

Put the Truth on the Front: Ghana Needs Warning Labels on Junk Food

Published

on

Walk into any supermarket in Accra, Kumasi, or Tamale today, and you will see the modern Ghanaian diet packaged as ‘progress.’ You will see breakfast cereals with cartoon mascots, fruit drinks that are mostly sugar and colour, and snacks promising energy and happiness in bright fonts.

Even products loaded with salt and unhealthy fats often wear a health halo labeled as fortified or natural, while the real nutritional risk is hidden in tiny print on the back. This is not just a consumer inconvenience; it is a public health blind spot. Ghana is living through a silent surge of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) like hypertension, diabetes, and stroke.

These conditions quietly drain household income and steal productive years. According to the Ghana Health Service (GHS) and World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates, NCDs are now responsible for nearly 45 per cent of all deaths in Ghana.

We cannot build a healthy nation on a food environment designed to confuse people at the point of purchase. Ghana must mandate simple front-of-pack warning labels (FOPWL) on high-sugar, high-salt, and high-fat packaged foods because consumers deserve truth at a glance, and industry must be pushed to reformulate.

Advertisement

Why Back-of-Pack Labels Are Not Enough

In theory, consumers can read nutrition panels. In reality, most Ghanaians shop under pressure, limited time, rising prices, and children tugging at their sleeves. The back label is a relic that requires a high cognitive load to interpret—essentially, the seller knows what is inside, but the buyer cannot easily tell.

This ‘information asymmetry’ is not fair. It is not consumer choice when the information needed to choose well is deliberately difficult to find.

Simple warning labels like the black octagons used in the Chilean Model act as a ‘stop-and-think’ nudge. They do not ban products but they simply tell the truth so people can decide.


Reshaping Our Food Environment

A generation ago, Ghana’s meals were mostly home-prepared, like kenkey and banku with soups and stews. Today, ultra-processed foods have become the norm, especially in urban areas. Children are growing up with sugary drinks and salty snacks as everyday items, not occasional treats.

Advertisement

If Ghana is serious about prevention, we must act where decisions are made—thus, the shelf. Warning labels protect parents from sugar traps and pressure the market to improve. When warning labels are mandatory, manufacturers start to compete to make healthier recipes to avoid the stigma of the label.


Addressing the Pushback

Industry will argue that labels create fear or that education alone is enough. However, health education is slow; labels work immediately. While the informal street food sector is a challenge, regulating pre-packaged goods is the practical starting point because the supply chain is traceable. We cannot wait until the whole system is perfect; we must start where action is feasible.


A 2026 Implementation Roadmap for Ghana

To move from talk to action, Ghana needs this 5-step plan:

  1. Issue mandatory regulation: The Ministry of Health, Food and Drug Authority (FDA), and Ghana Standards Authority (GSA) must define the label format and nutrient thresholds for all pre-packaged foods.
  2. Simple, bold symbols: Use plain language and clear symbols, such as “HIGH IN SUGAR,” designed for busy families, not experts.
  3. Transparent thresholds: Adopt technically defensible standards adapted to the Ghanaian diet.
  4. Transition and enforce: Provide a 12–18 month period for manufacturers to reformulate, followed by firm enforcement at ports and retail centers.
  5. National literacy campaign: The Ghana Health Service must pair labels with public messages explaining why high salt or sugar increases disease risk.

Conclusion: Truth Is Not a Luxury

Prevention is cheaper than treatment. A warning label costs little compared to the price of dialysis, stroke rehabilitation, or lifelong diabetes complications. A black octagon on a box of biscuits is more than a label; it is a shield for the health of all Ghanaians. It is time to put the truth where we can see it, right on the front.

By Abigail Amoah Sarfo

Advertisement

Join our WhatsApp Channel now!
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBElzjInlqHhl1aTU27

Continue Reading

Features

The Dangers of Over-Boxing

Published

on

Azumah and Fenech in a bout

Natives of the Kenkey Kingdom were mad with joy. They were still recovering from the hangover of the kingdom’s loss of the African Cup when their spirits were rekindled. Their great warrior, Zoom Zoom, stormed Melbourne and made sure that every Australian refused food. And that was after he had drawn contour lines on the face of their idol, Jeff Fenech.

Not only did the terrible warrior transform Old Boy Jeff’s face into a contour map useful for geography lessons, but he also accomplished the feat of retaining the much-envied super-kenkeyweight title against all odds. The warrior had not been eating hot kenkey for nothing.


The Fight Against Fenech

When Jeff Fenech bit the dust in the eighth round, I was tempted to consider if Adanko Deka could not have faced him in any twelve-rounder, title or non-title bout. Adanko has improved tremendously, and soon he would be facing Pernell Whitaker.

Sincerely, I was pessimistic about Azumah’s man, who the last time took him through twelve grueling rounds of rough boxing. I expressed my fears to my colleague Christian Abbew, alias Gbonyo, who surprisingly had total confidence that the Australian brawler would fall, predictably in Round Five.

Gbonyo gave reasons for his contention, all of which I counteracted using the age factor. Fact is, I didn’t know that contrary to the laws of nature, Azumah was all the time growing younger.

Advertisement

When Fenech fell briefly in round one, I asked my brother whether it was the same Fenech that fought Azumah in Las Vegas. Sure, it was the same Fenech, all out to beat Azumah before his countrymen.

But the African Professor had no intention of making the Australian a hero. As he spun round the desperate Aussie, dancing and stinging out his jabs, it was not too long before I realized that the end was near.


The Eighth Round Showdown

Two minutes into the eighth round, the African ring-master proved to the whole world that he was a true son of Bukom. He himself was cornered, but like the tough nut he is, he managed to break free before overwhelming the panting Australian with several blows that made him crash headlong.

Moments after, the referee, expressing fatherly sympathy, stopped the fight to prevent an obituary. After the ordeal, Fenech’s fairly handsome face was full of newly constructed hills, valleys, ox-bow lakes—whatever. I noticed that his nose was very tired and had a miniature volcano sitting restlessly on it. Obviously, Jeff’s wife will have to nurse that nose back to its normal shape—but I’d advise her not to use iodine, otherwise her dear husband will wail like a banshee.

Advertisement

Reflections on Boxing

Because Mohammed Ali was the kind of boxer kids liked, many school-going kids often entertained the wish of becoming like him. I remember one day when I told my father I wanted to become a boxer, and he advised me to first complete my education to the highest level. Then, if I decided to become a boxer and was knocked out a couple of times, I’d fall back on my degrees and make a living.

Boxing used to be interesting when bouts were fought more with the mouth and tongue than with gloves. You had to brag well, psychologically belittling your opponent before beating him up physically. Mohammed Ali became a very successful pugilist because he also managed to become a poet. He often blew his horn across America, calling himself the “pretty boxer” and opponents like Joe Frazier “the gorilla.”

Ali made a living fighting hard fists like Joe Frazier, Ken Norton, Jerry Quarry, George Foreman, Leon Spinks, and Trevor Berbick. Twice he came back from retirement to fight just for money. It was Larry Holmes who finally pensioned him, and since then the great Ali has never been himself.


The Path Ahead for Azumah

When Azumah nailed Jeff Fenech on the cross and barked almost immediately that he was after the head of Pernell Whitaker, I was happy but concerned. I would have been happier if he had announced his resignation there and then—he would have been more of a hero. Beating Fenech in Australia is more newsworthy than facing Whitaker in the States.

Advertisement

With Whitaker, it might be a little difficult. The “Sweet Pea” is agile, has a crooked body like a snake with diarrhea, and stands awkwardly as a southpaw. He is known for having the fastest pair of fists and the rare ability to dodge punches no matter how close they may be.

Much as I do not doubt that Azumah can take his title, I also don’t want him to retire beaten. I want him to retire as a hero and live a fuller, healthy life.

As Azumah himself said after dishing Fenech, he is now a professor and has something to show for it. Like a true professor, I think it is time he resigned and took up training young talents who could draw inspiration from him and become like him in the future.


Closing Thoughts

I must say that although ageing boxers like Larry Holmes and George Foreman are making a name for themselves, boxing is not like the Civil Service, where you can even change your age and retire at 74. Zoom Zoom has delighted the hearts of the natives, and Sikaman will forever hold him in high esteem—but only when he retires as a hero.

Advertisement

This article was first published on Saturday, March 7, 1992.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending