Features
Award schemes, NOTICEBOARDon merit or for sale?

- /home/u249204778/domains/spectator.com.gh/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://spectator.com.gh/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Plaque1-800x600.jpg&description=Award schemes, NOTICEBOARDon merit or for sale?', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/u249204778/domains/spectator.com.gh/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://spectator.com.gh/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Plaque1-800x600.jpg&description=Award schemes, NOTICEBOARDon merit or for sale?', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
Across Ghana today, awards schemes have become almost as common as billboards. From business and entertainment to leadership and social impact, dozens of organisations now host glamorous ceremonies promising to honour ‘excellence.’
But behind the glitz, red carpets, and gold-plated plaques, a troubling reality is emerging: for many nominees, recognition is no longer earned; it is purchased.
Paid path to excellence
In interviews across Tamale and Accra, several nominees revealed a pattern that has become all too familiar. They receive a congratulatory call announcing their nomination, often framed as a recognition of hard work and impact.
Days later, the real message follows: they must pay to secure a seat, table, or plaque.
Event organisers often invite high-profile dignitaries’ like regional ministers, public officials, celebrities to appear on their flyers and at their events, creating a façade of legitimacy that convinces nominees and the public alike.
Yet, beneath the polished speeches lies a difficult question: How relevant or credible are these awards?
A young creative professional in Tamale, who asked not to be named, shared her experience.
“They congratulated me for my exceptional work,” she recounted. “But later, they said I had to pay GH¢2,000 for a table and for the plaque. When I said I couldn’t afford it, they told me maybe next year. That’s when I realised it was never about merit.”
The rise of ‘Vote-to-Win’ economy
Beyond direct payments, another trend is sweeping through Ghana’s awards landscape: vote-based competitions where winners are determined not by impact or quality, but by how many votes they can garner often through paid SMS on mobile money platforms.
This has turned recognition into a popularity contest.
“I had to beg people every day,” said a young social entrepreneur. “Friends, strangers, WhatsApp groups everywhere. I thought I was being honoured for my work, but I was really just competing for airtime and mobile money.”
High cost of chasing validation
For some, the pursuit of recognition has come with a heavy financial burden. One woman revealed she spent more than GH¢23,000 on various awards over three years.
“Each organiser said the award would boost my credibility,” she said. “I paid for seats, plaques, adverts everything. I have the awards, but sometimes I wonder if any of them were truly earned,” she added.
While a few beneficiaries argue that such awards help with publicity or branding, many more believe the practice cheapens the meaning of excellence.
Booming industry built on prestige
Award events often staged in luxury hotels with celebrity hosts and elaborate decorations have become lucrative business ventures. They earn revenue through seat sales, sponsorship deals, photography packages, nomination fees, and promotional slots.
A former event planner admitted that financial targets sometimes influence who gets honoured.
“We had quotas,” he said. “If someone expresses interest, we followed up with payment details. Those who couldn’t pay didn’t make the final list,” he revealed.
Growing calls for regulation
Veteran journalist, Frederick Osei Agyemang, described the current situation plainly: “Some of these awards are nothing short of scams. They damage public trust. Awards should reward genuine achievement, not financial contributions.”
He emphasised that while organisers have operational costs, those expenses must not determine who receives recognition.
As the boundary between genuine honour, commercial interest becomes increasingly blurred, many Ghanaians are beginning to question the credibility of these award events.
One young entrepreneur from Tamale, Sidney Adjetey, recalled being informed that he had won an award but to attend the ceremony, he needed to pay for two or three tables ranging between GH¢5,000 and GH¢10,000.
“I kept wondering whether I was truly qualified,” he said. “Because if I am, why must I pay for a seat?”
He added that he has since stopped attending award ceremonies altogether.
“I’d rather invest in my work than spend money on a trophy.”
Future
With public skepticism rising, the pressure for accountability and ethical standards in the award industry is intensifying. Many believe that unless transparency improves, these schemes risk eroding the very essence of honour.
Until reforms take root, one question hangs heavily in the air:
When did honour stop being earned and start being bought?
By Geoffrey Buta, Tamale
Join our WhatsApp Channel now!
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBElzjInlqHhl1aTU27
Features
The eye is indeed the lamp of the body
There is a scripture that is found in Matthew 6:22 which says that the lamp of the body is the eye and therefore the eye must see well to enable the body to get to its destination.
What most people do not know is that behind the scenes, there is a strong interaction between the eyes and the brain before a picture becomes clear. The state of mind therefore is crucial to the eye seeing clearly to enable the body to process accurately the information the eyes are feeding it for proper identification of what the eyes see.
This is similar to how a person behaves i.e. what informs the decisions that forms in the mind that results in the actions that a person performs. The actions of a person does not therefore just happen but is as a result of things that went on in the mind, which in most cases resulted from information passed on to it by the eyes either consciously or unconsciously.
There are so many issues that affect our society which makes one wonder, whether the people who displayed such acts were created by someone or something other than God.
How can a person see a beach created by God with beautiful beaches and fresh air blowing all around, decides to defecate at such places, and therefore desecrate the environment? lt is simply mind boggling?
When other people in other countries who dwell on the coast are using their beaches for tourist attraction purposes as a means of livelihood and also to promote environmental health, some people living around our beaches, have turned them into rubbish dumping sites and toilets.
It is a very sad situation and the earlier we did something about it the better. It is a national emergency that must engage the attention, first of the government and then the citizenry, where religious bodies and NGOs must play a critical role.
The things we focus on in this country, needs to be addressed. Our minds which processes the info the eyes send to the brain, must be disciplined. There are certain behaviours that a disciplined mind can ignore even when the eye has provided info to the brain. One of the things a disciplined mind does, is the avoidance of a second look, which is critical for every person who wants to avoid adultery or fornication.
Once a person is not blind, he will see things. The boobs, the ‘shankus’, the coca cola shapes, the light complexioned, the dark complexioned etc. the eyes will definitely see and report same to the brain. What the brain or the mind decides to do or instructs the eye to do is the issue.
It can decide to instruct the eye to take a second look and let the mind drool over it or say ignore it and that will be the end.
If the mind becomes trained to focus on environmental issues like clean environment, the eyes will automatically be reporting on insanitary conditions to the brain as and when it sees them. The mind will pay attention to such data and begin to process them and to identify solutions to deal with the reported insanitary conditions.
There is the need to encourage citizens to train the mind to focus on the right thing so that in tandem with the eyes, focus will be maintained. When the mind is so trained, it communicates with the eye to also focus on hood things that helps in both are spiritual life and our secular lives, for indeed the eyes are the lamp of the body. God bless.
Features
Arming the Sikaman journalists to the teeth

THE relationship between New Times Corporation (NTC) and African Concrete Productions (ACP) is based entirely on matters of the stomach. Each depends on the other in a dietary symbiosis, reinforced by the close proximity of each other
At lunchtime, you’d see a particular set of Times workers marching regimentally to ACP to face the wall. You’d think they are soldiers. It has long been declared that the company manufactures the best kokonte in the Greater Accra Region. ACP is, therefore, a culinary haven for those NTC kokonte fans, both male and female.
As the NTC kokonte warriors cross the border to ACP, you’d see some ACP banku fanatics dancing joyously to NTC. They are lucky folks because they do not have to obtain visa to enter into ‘Times’ to attack the balls of banku with precision and accuracy. They also claim that the lightsoup at ‘Times’ is arguably the best in West Africa.
So the relationship between the two entities was quite cordial and based practically on stomach palaver, until ACP workers staged an industrial revolution, whereupon the managing director, accountant and estate manager were allegedly stripped naked and locked up in a room. An insurgency had began in earnest.
An ACP worker came to ‘Times’, this time not to eat banku and okro. He had come to inform newsmen that juicy stuff awaited them at ACP. It could make a front page lead story.
A camerawoman and a female reporter were accordingly dispatched to go and bring back news, juicy news as juicy as kokonte and groundnut soup.
I was driving to work when I espied the familiar camerawoman clicking away outside the ACP premises. I didn’t see any ‘Times’ reporter but angry workers who were on the verge of getting violent. I slowed down and the driver behind blew his horn at me like a lunatic. I drove on.
Later, I heard the reporter and camerawoman were harassed and brutalised. The report came,. “The camerawoman, Mrs Salome Adonu-Agbottah and reporter Mrs Doreen Allotey, in an attempt to retrieve the camera which the workers had seized from them were severely beaten. They were manhandled and almost pushed into a big gutter opposite the company’s premises.
BRUISES
“….The camerawoman had bruises on her body, her hand bag was destroyed and the money in it stolen. Mrs Allotey’s watch was also snatched and her feet stamped on.”
Luckily, it was not her nose that was trampled upon. She has a beautiful nose.
The bad news was received with extreme sorrow. If the victims had been men, it would not have seemed too bad. But to brutalise women is just unacceptable. The New Times Corporation has not stopped mourning the incident which has been condemned in many circles.
Some people keep asking me why Times sent females to cover a potentially violent demonstration. I tell them they might as well ask why CNN’s amazon, Christina Amanpour, is assigned to cover the carnage in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Rwanda. She is always on the frontline in jeans and jacket.
Journalism is a potentially hazardous profession, and once you accept to study and practise the trade, you might as well bone up to face any assignment as long as your superiors feel you are capable of handling it or you have demonstrated the capacity to handle it. Both males and females can be assigned anywhere, anytime just like policemen and women are assigned.
The only difference between cops and pressmen is that the latter are armed only with a pen and the former with a gun. The question is should newsmen also arm themselves so that in any event of an assault they would not be found wanting in self-defence? They can’t adequately defend themselves with a pen and a jotter. A pen cannot even disfigure an opponent’s upper lip.
Photo-journalists have particularly suffered violence. Spectator ace-cameraman Vincent Dzatse was severely assaulted by AMA men when he attempted to take pictures of their indiscretions.
Sports cameraman, P. K. Arthur has been beaten more than once at the sports stadium when riots errupted and he wanted to capture it on his lenses.
Some sports journalists have been banned from entering the Accra Sports Stadium by supporters because in their comments, they didn’t write “sense”. Some supporters once nearly lynched Christian Abbew, Spectator Sports Editor, near a courtroom. He was stoned like the biblical Stephen. He had gone to defend a contempt charge.
I think it is time journalists met and discussed how best to defend themselves in any event of an attack by individuals or mobs. In the pursuance of their duty, they must be free from harassment and assault.
Some journalists go to work and return home with a black-eye or a double fore-head. It is just not right. Something has to be done about it. I think journalists should be armed. But first we must be trained in the use of firearms so that our warning shot do not hit below the belt. What about training in Kung Fu?
This article was first published on Saturday, October 17, 1998.









