Connect with us

News

What is ‘premium’ about a Ghana card?

Published

on

Dear Editor,

The National Identification Card otherwise known as the ‘Ghana card’ is supposed to be necessity and not luxury. Every Ghanaian is entitled to it, hence the authority charged to produce the cards must treat it as a public service.

The card, in my opinion, is being treated as a scarce commodity with the National Identification Authority (NIA) acting as private enterprise other than a state institution.

Apart from the challenges citizens had to endure in registering for the card, issuance of the card had delayed until recently when the NIA decided to release them.

Advertisement

Early this week, I overheard the NIA boss saying the authority intends to introduce a “premium service” for individuals who are unable to register for the card during the mass registration.

Per the arrangement, the service would be available after December 2020 where individuals or institutions would have to pay between GH¢ 100.00 and GH¢ 250.00 to acquire the card.

This announcement got me thinking; why should there be a ‘premium’ on a Ghana card? With this, the authority seems to be aiming at making profit which, I think, should not be the case. 

I am aware a good number of citizens do not have the card but how many of them can pay this amount after December? Does the NIA intend to treat the Ghana card as a passport or driver’s licence?

Advertisement

I believe the authority must be thinking of making the card more accessible to the public even after the mass registration, and should not be thinking of making profit.

Citizens do not have to spend that much to acquire a Ghana card. We have had a fair share of institutions that have ‘bullied’ us well enough in this regard. The NIA must not join them.

Kakra Ofori

Mampong

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

How Nana Butler took down exploitative Management Committees

Published

on

The year was 1993, and the destination was Australia. Down Under, the Black Satellites—Ghana’s exceptionally gifted Under-20 national team—were busy treating the footballing world to a masterclass. They ran, they tackled, they outclassed England, and they fought their way to a historic silver medal. But while the players were leaving their blood and sweat on the pitch in Sydney, an entirely different, much more lucrative sport was being played in the VIP lounges and luxury hotel rooms.

It was the ancient, revered African art of “Management Allowance Harvesting.”

Upon the team’s return, the newly appointed Ghana Football Association (GFA) Chairman, Samuel Nana Brew-Butler, glanced at the tournament’s financial ledgers. What he discovered was a mathematical miracle that would baffle even the finest economists.

The Management Committee, heavily populated by suit-wearing, brief-case-wielding officials under the leadership of Paul Kunke, had pulled off a breathtaking victory. They didn’t win a trophy, but they had comprehensively defeated the actual athletes in the per diem stakes. The officials had taken home significantly more money in allowances than the young boys who had spent 90 minutes sweating under the blistering Australian sun.

Advertisement

Faced with a squad of administrators who clearly possessed a higher “strike rate” at the bank than the strikers did on the field, Nana Butler did the only logical thing. He took a giant administrative sledgehammer and completely dissolved all the GFA Management Committees.

The True “Strikers” of Ghana Football

To understand the sheer genius of the Kunke-led management committee, one must appreciate the sheer physical exertion required to be a football official in the 1990s.

While a player like Augustine Ahinful or Samuel Osei Kuffour only had to worry about running several kilometres, avoiding bone-crushing tackles, and scoring goals against Brazil, the management committee faced far more hazardous perils. There were heavy per diem envelopes to be lifted. There were grueling, five-star buffet lunches to navigate. There was the exhausting psychological stress of checking whether the hotel’s air conditioning was set to the perfect ambient temperature.

Advertisement

Is it any wonder, then, that the administrative “allowance-to-sweat ratio” was heavily skewed toward the boardroom? The players were running on patriotism and the promise of future glory; the officials were running on high-grade, cold, hard foreign currency. Rumour has it that the officials’ wallets were so heavy they required their own tactical formations just to be carried through airport customs.

The Butler Cleans House

When Nana Brew-Butler took over the reins of the GFA, he brought with him a revolutionary, almost bizarre philosophy: that football money should actually have something to do with the people playing football.

When the financial reports from the 1993 World Youth Championship landed on his desk, the numbers told a hilarious story. The management committee had apparently operated under the assumption that they were the primary entertainment act, and the eleven players on the pitch were merely their opening warm-up band.

Advertisement

Recognising that Ghana’s real footballing talent was sitting in the committee rooms engineering per diem payouts rather than scoring goals, Butler struck. In a swift, unceremonious purge, he dissolved the committees, effectively telling the suits that if they wanted to earn that much money from football, they should buy some boots, practice their step-overs, and try making the squad for the next tournament.

It was a dark day for administrative freeloaders across the capital. For a brief moment in Ghanaian history, the ecosystem was thrown out of balance: the players were treated as heroes, and the committee members were forced to look at their bank accounts and reflect on the tragic loss of their premium per diems.

A Timeless Legacy

Decades later, the ghost of Australia ’93 still hovers over Ghanaian football. Nana Butler’s mass dissolution remains a golden, satirical benchmark for how to deal with the eternal affliction of “Committee-itis”—a disease where the number of officials on a plane outnumbers the players, and where the budget for official blazers exceeds the budget for training kits.

Advertisement

The lesson from 1993 remains clear: if you allow the suits to score more heavily than the boots, you will eventually find yourself with an empty trophy cabinet and a very wealthy boardroom. Cheers to Nana Butler, the man who reminded the nation that football is played with a leather ball on grass, not with a calculator in a five-star hotel.

By Emmanuel Amponsah

The writer is a former Editor of The Spectator

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Agona West MP supports Swedru School of Business with mono desks

Published

on

Member of Parliament for Agona West, Ernestina Ofori Dangbey, has donated mono desks to the Swedru School of Business (SWESBUS) as part of efforts to improve education infrastructure in the constituency.

Presenting the desks on Tuesday, the MP said the intervention is aimed at addressing some of the infrastructural challenges facing the school and enhancing the learning experience of students.

“Investing in Education, Investing in Our Future. Yesterday, I presented mono desks to the Swedru School of Business as part of my ongoing efforts to strengthen the educational system in Agona West,” she stated.

“Every student deserves a conducive environment in which to learn, grow and achieve their full potential. This intervention is therefore aimed at helping address some of the infrastructural needs of the school and improving the learning experience of our students.”

Madam Ofori Dangbey reaffirmed her commitment to supporting schools in Agona West and creating opportunities for young people in the area.

Advertisement

“I remain committed to supporting our schools and creating opportunities for the young people of Agona West. Agona West Will Continue to Rise,” she added.

By Edem Mensah-Tsotorme

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending