Connect with us

News

Tackling gender discrimination …Give boys, girls equal opportunity to thrive

Published

on

Boys and girls deserve an equal opportunity to thrive

Boys and girls deserve an equal opportunity to thrive

Every girl and boy deserves an equal chance to survive and thrive, yet gender discrimination, continues to rob them of their childhood and limit their potentials.

The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (UNESCWA) defines gender discrimi­nation as any distinction, exclusion or restriction made on the basis of sex which has the effect or purpose of impairing or nullifying the rec­ognition, enjoyment or exercise by women, irrespective of their marital status, on the basis of equality of men and women, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural, civil or any other field.

Gender discrimination has the tendency to deny girls their rights, kept from school, forced to marry and subjected to violence while her voice is undervalued. This assault on childhood also deprives nations of the energy and talent they need to progress.

Advertisement
Both boys and girls face unequal gender and social
norms regarding expectations and access to resources
Both boys and girls face unequal gender and social norms regarding expectations and access to resources

According to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), boys also suffer from gender norms. Notions of masculinity can fuel child labour, gang violence and recruitment into armed groups. No matter where it prevails, or how it manifests, gender inequality harms every member of society.

An International Organisation, Save the Children says, it will take over 200 years to achieve gender equality, and that is just in the Unit­ed States of America (USA).

The organisation therefore describes as unacceptable, adding that together, we can create a more equal world, right from the start.

What are the causes of gender discrimination?

Gender discrimination begins from childhood. From the moment girls and boys are born, they face unequal gender norms as well as social norms regarding expectations and access to resources and oppor­tunities in their homes, schools and communities.

Advertisement

For example, girls are most of­ten made to carry or do household chores with the notion of preparing them for future marriage, pregnancy and caring for their children while the boys are often encouraged to go to school and get an education to prepare for work.

This tendency often leads to child marriage and pregnancy among girls.

Effects of gender discrimination

In Ghana, gender discrimination among boys and girls exposes them to the possibility of child marriage, teenage pregnancy, child domestic work, poor education and health, sexual abuse, exploitation and vio­lence.

Advertisement

Girls are more likely than their male counterparts to drop out of school, marry at an early age, and experience challenges in their sexual and reproductive health and rights. They are also more likely to be exposed to violence and exploited in child labour.

Way Forward

Gender equality is a basic right for all people, including both girls and boys, it is therefore critical for Ghana to directly address gender discrimination in order to ensure that no harm comes to children while ensuring that every child attains their equal right to grow up healthily, educated and safe.

Gender equality is essential to close the inequality gaps including those who are most vulnerable.

Advertisement

To build a more equal, inclusive future, free from gender discrimina­tion, Ghana needs to start in child­hood.

Also according to Ghanaians Against Child Abuse (GACA), a social drive campaign for the protection of children and also aimed at re­ducing violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation of children, gender in­equalities were drivers of many child protection violations.

They begin with boys’ and girls’ socialisation in the family, school or community which encourages them to follow specific cultural norms and roles deemed appropriate for their gender.

The gendered socialisation can mean that girls are expected to do more domestic work, not get as much or as quality schooling as boys, to marry younger, be less mobile, or tolerate physical and sexual abuse.

Advertisement

Conversely, it can mean that boys are expected to be more aggressive, violent, mobile, unruly and respon­sible for and capable of making money, having a job, etc.

GACA said it is the role of fam­ilies, schools and communities to ensure boys and girls grow up with more gender equitable roles and practices, and achieve gender equi­table outcomes in protection, safety and life opportunities.

According to UNICEF, Gender equality means that girls and boys enjoy the same rights, resources, opportunities and protections. In 2021, UNICEF ushered in a new gen­der policy (2021–2030) articulating its vision for gender equality in its programmes, as well as at workplac­es and practices, around the globe.

The Gender Action Plan (2022– 2025) charts UNICEF’s way forward with a series of time-bound results that deliver lasting, transformative change for children, adolescents and women worldwide.

Advertisement

UNICEF and other internation­al organisations are working with partners in Ghana on a variety of educational initiatives including the development of gender-responsive school curricula; gender training for education professionals to help elim­inate gender discrimination.

Conclusion

Tackling gender discrimination in boys and girls is a collective responsibility for all Ghanaians. It is therefore important for individu­als, organisations and governments to take deliberate steps to achieve gender equality for all irrespective of one’s gende

 By Jemima Esinam Kuatsinu

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

How Nana Butler took down exploitative Management Committees

Published

on

The year was 1993, and the destination was Australia. Down Under, the Black Satellites—Ghana’s exceptionally gifted Under-20 national team—were busy treating the footballing world to a masterclass. They ran, they tackled, they outclassed England, and they fought their way to a historic silver medal. But while the players were leaving their blood and sweat on the pitch in Sydney, an entirely different, much more lucrative sport was being played in the VIP lounges and luxury hotel rooms.

It was the ancient, revered African art of “Management Allowance Harvesting.”

Upon the team’s return, the newly appointed Ghana Football Association (GFA) Chairman, Samuel Nana Brew-Butler, glanced at the tournament’s financial ledgers. What he discovered was a mathematical miracle that would baffle even the finest economists.

The Management Committee, heavily populated by suit-wearing, brief-case-wielding officials under the leadership of Paul Kunke, had pulled off a breathtaking victory. They didn’t win a trophy, but they had comprehensively defeated the actual athletes in the per diem stakes. The officials had taken home significantly more money in allowances than the young boys who had spent 90 minutes sweating under the blistering Australian sun.

Advertisement

Faced with a squad of administrators who clearly possessed a higher “strike rate” at the bank than the strikers did on the field, Nana Butler did the only logical thing. He took a giant administrative sledgehammer and completely dissolved all the GFA Management Committees.

The True “Strikers” of Ghana Football

To understand the sheer genius of the Kunke-led management committee, one must appreciate the sheer physical exertion required to be a football official in the 1990s.

While a player like Augustine Ahinful or Samuel Osei Kuffour only had to worry about running several kilometres, avoiding bone-crushing tackles, and scoring goals against Brazil, the management committee faced far more hazardous perils. There were heavy per diem envelopes to be lifted. There were grueling, five-star buffet lunches to navigate. There was the exhausting psychological stress of checking whether the hotel’s air conditioning was set to the perfect ambient temperature.

Advertisement

Is it any wonder, then, that the administrative “allowance-to-sweat ratio” was heavily skewed toward the boardroom? The players were running on patriotism and the promise of future glory; the officials were running on high-grade, cold, hard foreign currency. Rumour has it that the officials’ wallets were so heavy they required their own tactical formations just to be carried through airport customs.

The Butler Cleans House

When Nana Brew-Butler took over the reins of the GFA, he brought with him a revolutionary, almost bizarre philosophy: that football money should actually have something to do with the people playing football.

When the financial reports from the 1993 World Youth Championship landed on his desk, the numbers told a hilarious story. The management committee had apparently operated under the assumption that they were the primary entertainment act, and the eleven players on the pitch were merely their opening warm-up band.

Advertisement

Recognising that Ghana’s real footballing talent was sitting in the committee rooms engineering per diem payouts rather than scoring goals, Butler struck. In a swift, unceremonious purge, he dissolved the committees, effectively telling the suits that if they wanted to earn that much money from football, they should buy some boots, practice their step-overs, and try making the squad for the next tournament.

It was a dark day for administrative freeloaders across the capital. For a brief moment in Ghanaian history, the ecosystem was thrown out of balance: the players were treated as heroes, and the committee members were forced to look at their bank accounts and reflect on the tragic loss of their premium per diems.

A Timeless Legacy

Decades later, the ghost of Australia ’93 still hovers over Ghanaian football. Nana Butler’s mass dissolution remains a golden, satirical benchmark for how to deal with the eternal affliction of “Committee-itis”—a disease where the number of officials on a plane outnumbers the players, and where the budget for official blazers exceeds the budget for training kits.

Advertisement

The lesson from 1993 remains clear: if you allow the suits to score more heavily than the boots, you will eventually find yourself with an empty trophy cabinet and a very wealthy boardroom. Cheers to Nana Butler, the man who reminded the nation that football is played with a leather ball on grass, not with a calculator in a five-star hotel.

By Emmanuel Amponsah

The writer is a former Editor of The Spectator

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Agona West MP supports Swedru School of Business with mono desks

Published

on

Member of Parliament for Agona West, Ernestina Ofori Dangbey, has donated mono desks to the Swedru School of Business (SWESBUS) as part of efforts to improve education infrastructure in the constituency.

Presenting the desks on Tuesday, the MP said the intervention is aimed at addressing some of the infrastructural challenges facing the school and enhancing the learning experience of students.

“Investing in Education, Investing in Our Future. Yesterday, I presented mono desks to the Swedru School of Business as part of my ongoing efforts to strengthen the educational system in Agona West,” she stated.

“Every student deserves a conducive environment in which to learn, grow and achieve their full potential. This intervention is therefore aimed at helping address some of the infrastructural needs of the school and improving the learning experience of our students.”

Madam Ofori Dangbey reaffirmed her commitment to supporting schools in Agona West and creating opportunities for young people in the area.

Advertisement

“I remain committed to supporting our schools and creating opportunities for the young people of Agona West. Agona West Will Continue to Rise,” she added.

By Edem Mensah-Tsotorme

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending