Connect with us

News

OSP responds to claims by Lawyer Martin Kpebu, details events leading to his Arrest

Published

on

The Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) has responded to claims made by private legal practitioner, Martin Kpebu, following his arrest at the OSP premises.

In a statement issued by Sammy Darko, Director of Strategy, Research and Communication, the Office said Mr. Kpebu has a history of misconduct whenever he visits the OSP, often giving the public a different version of events afterward.

According to the Office, this is not the first or second time he has clashed with security officers performing their lawful duties.

The OSP referenced previous instances where Mr. Kpebu made public claims that later turned out to be false, including his statement that 16 petitions had been filed for the removal of the Special Prosecutor claims he later admitted were unverified.

Advertisement

The OSP said the confrontation that led to his arrest has nothing to do with the ongoing investigation into allegations he made against the Special Prosecutor.

It stated that he has repeatedly refused to cooperate with investigators, often demanding that certain officers be removed from the panel and then introducing new challenges after those demands are met. Despite these difficulties, investigators have continued with their work, the Office added.

In the statement, the OSP rejected claims by Mr. Kpebu that “junior staff” were handling his case.

It clarified that the officers working on the matter hold ranks equivalent to Deputy Commissioners of Police.

Advertisement

It also dismissed his assertion that “the OSP is investigating itself,” explaining that fact-finding committees are meant to establish facts, not determine guilt.

The Office compared this to misconduct cases in other institutions, noting that police matters are not investigated by fire service officers and vice versa.

Providing details of what happened on the day of the incident, the OSP said Mr. Kpebu arrived at the premises, parked outside the gate, and began speaking to journalists, a routine practice for him.

Security officers cautioned him not to block the entrance, after which he moved to a nearby food vendor’s spot to continue the interview. When he entered the compound, officers reminded him that taking pictures or videos on the premises was not allowed.

Advertisement

According to the OSP, he became angry, insulted the officers, and claimed he could act however he wished.

It stated that he referred to the officers and even the OSP leadership as “nobodies” who would soon be removed.

His behaviour, the Office said, led to his arrest for obstructing officers in the performance of their duties. The OSP stressed that the arrest was done without force and that there is no internal record of any assault or mistreatment.

The Office added that Mr. Kpebu was granted bail through normal administrative procedures. However, one of his lawyers allegedly refused to leave the premises, insulted officers, and caused a scene.

Advertisement

She was later escorted out without the use of force. Mr. Kpebu was then transferred to a designated holding area as part of standard processing.

The OSP said all procedures followed protocol and that he was not denied access to legal representation at any point.

The statement also rejected suggestions that the OSP had “fallen into a trap.”

It said the Office acted strictly within the law and that no amount of public influence, connections, or media prominence should place anyone above lawful procedures.

Advertisement

It added that similar behaviour at any police or intelligence facility would also result in immediate arrest.

According to the OSP, Mr. Kpebu is expected to report back to the Office at 11 a.m. today to assist with further investigations into the obstruction case.

A different date will be announced for the continuation of the inquiry into his allegations of corruption.

By: Jacob Aggrey

Advertisement

News

GNFS trains students and staff of Manso Amenfi Technical Institute on Fire Safety

Published

on

A team of Officers from the Asankrangwa Fire Station, led by the Municipal Fire Officer, DOII Frank Asiamah Yankah, conducted fire safety education for students and staff of Manso Amenfi Technical Institute.

The exercise forms part of the station’s ongoing efforts to intensify fire prevention awareness ahead of the festive and harmattan seasons.

Participants were educated on key fire safety practices, including electrical safety, dormitory fire precautions, and kitchen safety for pantry staff.

The team also demonstrated basic firefighting techniques, such as, effective use of extinguishers and fire blanket application.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Ashanti Regional Minister denies involvement in detention of Wendell Nana Yaw Yeboah

Published

on

Ashanti Regional Minister, Dr. Frank Amoakohene, has rejected claims that he is responsible for the continued detention of Wendell Nana Yaw Yeboah.

His response follows public comments by journalist Manasseh Azure Awuni and activist Oliver Barker-Vormawor, who suggested that the minister influenced the case.

In a statement, Dr. Amoakohene described the claims as “inaccurate, misleading, and unfair.”

He said it was important to correct the record so the public is not misinformed.

Advertisement

In a facebook post, Dr. Amoakohene explained that he has no authority to order or influence the detention of any suspect.

He stressed that the matter is being handled by the Ghana Police Service, which operates independently.

According to him, the suspect is not being held in any facility under the Regional Security Council (RECSEC), which he chairs.

He noted that RECSEC does not control police investigations or custodial matters.

Advertisement

The minister said the case began after a petition was filed over allegations made against three State Ministers.

The Criminal Investigations Department (CID) started an investigation as required by law, especially because the claims involved possible publication of false news.

Dr. Amoakohene added that there is also a civil defamation suit, which is separate from the police investigation and will continue based on its own legal processes.

Addressing questions about why the suspect remains in custody despite being granted bail of GHS 3,000, the minister said this is a matter for the police.

Advertisement

He emphasised that he has no legal role in setting or enforcing bail conditions.

Dr. Amoakohene criticised attempts to link him personally to the suspect’s detention, saying such comments misrepresent how the legal system works and create unnecessary tension.

He said he has never influenced any officer involved in the case.

The minister noted that the government remains committed to civil liberties and due process.

Advertisement

He encouraged the public and media to seek accurate information and avoid sharing claims that are not based on fact.

He added that his office is open for clarification and dialogue to help strengthen trust in state institutions.

By: Jacob Aggrey

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending