Hot!
Court dismisses suit against celebration of Kundum festival
- /home/u249204778/domains/spectator.com.gh/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://spectator.com.gh/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Nana-Egya-Kwamina-XI.jpg&description=Court dismisses suit against celebration of Kundum festival', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/u249204778/domains/spectator.com.gh/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://spectator.com.gh/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Nana-Egya-Kwamina-XI.jpg&description=Court dismisses suit against celebration of Kundum festival', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
• Nana Egya Kwamina XI
A Sekondi High Court last Thursday, dismissed a suit filed by a party to prevent the Apremdo Divisional Stool from celebrating its annual Kundum festival, stressing that the case was purely a chieftaincy matter.
The judgement of the court, presided over by Justice (Mrs) Hannah Taylor, has now paved the way for the Divisional Chief of Apremdo, Nana Egya Kwamina XI, also known as William Eghan, to celebrate same.
It, however, did not award any cost against the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs, Obaahema Kwandoh Kuma and Nana Nware Ezia II, had filed an injunction notice against the defendants (Kobina Burafo, William Eghan and Ernestina Brenya), seeking among others to restrain the three from celebrating the Kundum Festival, until the performance of the funeral rites of the late Chief, Nana Nyankeh Brem.
They again sought a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from celebrating the Kundum Festival until the determination of an appeal pending before the Western Regional House of Chiefs at Sekondi.
Plaintiffs claimed that, in accordance with the custom and tradition of the people of Apremdo, the defendants could not celebrate the Kundum festival without having in their possession, the Royal Black Stool, and without performing the funeral rites of the late Chief.
They further pleaded that the 1st and 3rd defendants, contrary to the Apremdo customary practices, installed the 2nd and 3rd defendants as the new Chief and Queenmother of Apremdo respectively.
However, the 1st and 2nd defendants denied the claims of the plaintiffs as being a Queenmother and Regent of Apremdo, contending that, by a decision of the Judicial Committee, the plaintiffs were not the Queenmother and Regent of Apremdo and, therefore, had no capacity to initiate the action.
Additionally, they argued that they were lawfully nominated, elected, confined and installed as the Chief and Queenmother of Apremdo, in accordance with the customs and traditions and duly gazetted with stool names, Nana Egya Kwamina XI and Nana Mozu respectively.
In her ruling, Justice Taylor said “Having considered the claims of the plaintiffs and the evidence largely, the case is a disguised cause or matter affecting chieftaincy and the reliefs sought by the plaintiffs are hereby dismissed. The third defendant’s counter claim is also dismissed.”
She again ruled that, “the plaintiff’s failure to call the custodian of customs and traditions of Ahanta land as to who sets the timetable and restrictions thereto of the celebration of the Kundum festival leads to the conclusion that they failed to discharge the burden so placed on them.”
The judge added that, “the reliefs sought by plaintiffs are so linked to the possession of the black stool which is key to the installation of a chief and that they contended in this case that, same is in their possession.”
The judge also referred to Obaahemaa Kwandoh Kuma’s answer to a question on whether William Eghan’s name had been entered in the register of Western Regional House of Chief as Divisional Chief of Apremdo with stool name Nana Egya Kwamina XI and admitted that the case had not been determined yet as no court had set the gazette publication aside.
From Clement Adzei Boye, Sekondi
General Secretary of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Justin Kodua Frimpong, has filed his nomination to contest the position of General Secretary again as the party begins its rebuilding efforts ahead of the 2028 general elections.
He was accompanied by party stalwarts and supporters who were in high spirits, expressing confidence that he is the right person to hold the position.
Speaking after filing his nomination, Mr Kodua Frimpong assured the rank and file of the party that he would not disappoint them.
“I can assure you that the faith the rank and file of the party have had in me, I will never disappoint them,” he said.
He also pledged to run a clean campaign devoid of personal attacks.
“I can assure you that our internal campaign will be devoid of personal attacks,” he told his fellow contestants and the rank and file of the party as he seeks to retain his position.
His tenure has seen the party through the 2024 general elections, where the NPP lost power to the National Democratic Congress (NDC) after eight years in government.
The party is currently in a rebuilding phase, with internal elections scheduled to elect new national executives to lead its reorganization towards the 2028 polls.
The General Secretary position is considered one of the most influential in the party’s administrative structure, responsible for the day-to-day running of the party secretariat and implementation of party decisions.
By Edem Mensah-Tsotorme
The University of Ghana Medical Centre (UGMC) has disputed claims made on social media by comedian Michael Blackson concerning the treatment given to his late mother, saying a review found that the allegations did not accurately reflect what happened during her stay at the hospital.
In a statement issued in Accra on August 5, 2026, the management of UGMC expressed condolences to Mr. Blackson and his family over the death of his 83-year-old mother, who died at the facility on July 16, 2026.
The hospital said it had taken the concerns raised by Mr. Blackson seriously and conducted a thorough review in line with its clinical and administrative procedures.
According to the statement, the facts presented by Mr. Blackson on social media contained “numerous inaccuracies” and did not accurately reflect the medical care provided to his mother.
UGMC explained that she was referred to the facility from another hospital and received treatment there from May 27 to July 16, 2026, a period of about eight weeks.
The hospital stated that it would not release details of her diagnosis, treatment, medical records or other aspects of her care because it had a duty to protect patient confidentiality, even after death.
It said the decision was intended to respect the dignity of the deceased and the privacy of her family.
UGMC further stated that all clinical decisions at the facility are made by qualified healthcare professionals based on medical judgment, established standards of care and the best interests of the patient.
The statement added that such decisions are made in consultation with authorised family representatives where necessary and that billing and financial procedures are governed by institutional policies and are separate from clinical decision-making.
The hospital noted that it values feedback from patients and their families and considers both positive and negative comments important for improving the quality of care.
Mr. Blackson had earlier used social media to criticise the care his mother received at UGMC, prompting the hospital’s response.
By: Jacob Aggrey
