Features
What is so special about this National Cathedral Project?
In recent times, the most trending news on social media platforms and the traditional news space, is on the National Cathedral Project being embarked upon by the government cum private partnership in Accra, the capital city of Ghana. Hardly a day passes, without hearing something controversial on this topical issue, either on our traditional airwaves or in the print media.
QUESTIONS FROM GHANAIANS ABOUT THE CATHEDRAL PROJECT
Some of the contentious questions people are asking about this particular project are; what is so special about this so-called national cathedral in the midst of the present economic difficulties? What at all is in this national cathedral project which has been hidden from Ghanaians? Why is the government adamant and so committed to this project in spite of numerous calls from Ghanaians to it to tackle pressing issues that will put the economy back on track? What significant benefit is the country and for that matter, the people are going to derive from this national cathedral? Is this project meant to benefit the government or any single individual? Who is behind this particular project and where is the funding coming from? Is it a state or private sponsored project? Why is it that other social intervention programmes such as the National School Feeding Programme (NSFP), National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) and the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) project are all in arrears, yet we want to spend huge funds on this national cathedral project?
GHANAIANS’ ANXIETY ABOUT THE CATHEDRAL PROJECT
These and many other questions are agitating the minds of millions of Ghanaians most of whom are Christians alright but they feel that the present circumstance in which people find it difficult to make ends meet, does not merit the building of a national cathedral at the expense of their poverty and sufferings. However, what the government is saying is that the building of a national cathedral is of necessity and paramount and would, therefore, not listen to the protest by the people on whose mandates they came to power. That is interesting, indeed!
FINANCE MINISTER’S DEFENCE FOR THE PROJECT
Our Finance Minister, Mr Ken Ofori-Atta, keeps defending the project saying it is a potential investment which would pay off in the future. Instead, he asked those who are opposing the project to be measured in their criticisms. He says government was mindful of taxpayers’ money being used to support the building of the national cathedral and was strategising to ensure that money pumped into the construction is recouped within the shortest possible time after construction.
To him, the current economic challenges should not deter the state from fulfilling its responsibility to build a monument that has huge investment potential. The cheek of it is that the Minister threw back his annoyance at Ghanaians on Ghana Broadcasting Corporation (GBC), the state broadcaster last Sunday for opposing the construction of the project. Hear him; “At any point in time when these buildings were built in Europe, was it ever the right time? How do we fund it will become the question? Is the Executive mindful of the current situation? We shouldn’t snuff out our religiousness or spirituality because we are poor. The Lord will understand if we put our widow’s mite in there”.
GHANAIANS ANXIOUS TO KNOW INVESTMENT POTENTIALS IN THIS PROJECT
The Finance Minister’s outburst on the state broadcaster on the opposition of this project is neither here nor there. Ghanaians will ask the minister; what kind of investment potential can they derive from this cathedral and in any case where will that benefits go to? Is it into people’s pocket or where? Will the benefits be shared to people who contributed to the fund towards the project? It is a fact that if the minister and his family are suffering like most Ghanaians who are finding it difficult to survive the present economic hardships in the country, he would have minded his choice of words, language and refrained from telling Ghanaians that they should not snuff out our religiousness or spirituality because they are poor.
In any case, how can the government release a colossal amount of GHc 25 million to the cathedral project as an additional seed money when projects meant to mitigate the hardships of most Ghanaians and the deprived communities are in huge arrears. That is unheard of in a sound democratic governance. Ghanaians are, indeed, not comfortable with the show of arrogance on the part of some of our leaders. They forget that we put them where they are through our thumbs.
COMPARING OURSELVES WITH OTHER ADVANCED NATIONS
Indeed, Ghana is a purely religious country with more than half of the population, 71.2 per cent forming the Christian community with about one-fifth making the Muslim movement and a small segment adhering to the traditional indigenous religions. Religious tolerance in Ghana is very high but that does not prevent the people from making the right choices and speaking their minds in times of difficulties and economic hardship. No right thinking person in Ghana will like to suffer while money meant to alleviate their sufferings are channelled to projects that are of less significance to the economic survival. All things being equal, Ghanaians will wholeheartedly embrace this cathedral project and contribute their quota towards its success, but that is not the case. In other jurisdictions such as United States of America and the United Kingdom among others, where they have these cathedrals in existence, they do not experience hardships like the way we do and, therefore, the system is smooth and friendly and can accommodate such project easily. There is no way we can compare ourselves with others who have put up cathedrals because their mode of financing some of these projects are entirely different from ours.
PROJECT LAUDABLE BUT NOT RELEVANT UNDER PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCE
This National Cathedral project is by all intents and purposes laudable not in dispute in any way because it is a planned inter-denominational Christian cathedral with a baptistery, a 5,000-seating capacity, two level auditorium, a grand central hall, music school, choir rehearsal, art gallery, shop as well as multi use spaces. We are told that aside all these facilities in the cathedral, it will serve also as the home to Africa’s first Bible Museum and Documentation Centre dedicated to Christianity and nation building in Ghana.
This ambitious project was an idea floated by President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo as part of Ghana’s 60th anniversary celebration and the design was unveiled by him in March 2018. Indeed, the beautiful design by David Adjaye and Associates, reflects the art and culture of Ghanaian ethnic groups, with the high pitched and staggered roof reminiscent of an Akan inspired architecture.
LET’S TREAD CAUTIOUSLY WITH THIS PROJECT
The cathedral project and its entire architecture are laudable initiative by the government which cannot be wished away. It portrays the level of Christian values in this country and how the people are anxious to worship the Almighty God with all their heart and might. However, the present economic circumstance, to many Ghanaians mostly the Christian community, does not encourage the construction of this project now using state resources. Ghanaians have raised their voices and if the government claims it is a listening one as it made us to understand at the initial stages, it can hold on to the project and bring it back at another time when the economy improves and on a sound footing. After all, there are quite a number of private auditoriums put up by some of the well-established religious leaders in our country which we can rely on for the meantime for both public and private engagements in addition to our well established various conference halls in Accra and elsewhere.
Contact email/WhatsApp of author:
0277753946/0248933366
By Charles Neequaye
The driver stopped the vehicle at the gate of the large, fenced property along the Nsawam Highway, and Kakraba stepped out to meet the several workers who had gathered to wait for him.
He greeted them and went straight to the point.
“Gentlemen, I am glad to see that you have almost completed the clearing of the land. I’m happy to report that we have concluded all arrangements with Nana Serebour, and construction of the palace will start in a few days.
“I will need you to go and level the ground, and then come back to start this project. Some workers from a construction company will come and join us.
“My plan is to build twenty houses in four months. Then we will do twenty more until we reach two hundred.
“I am relying on you to help me deliver good-quality work to satisfy our clients and, as I have already indicated to you, I will reward you for your work.”
After an hour’s discussion, he closed the meeting and moved to drive away. Wofa Yaw drew closer.
“Director, can you please spare me five minutes? I would like to discuss a small issue.”
“Why, Wofa Yaw? Your wife has threatened to leave you?”
“No, Director. My wife will never leave me. This concerns a young niece of mine.”
“I hope it’s something I can help with. Please sit in the car and let me hear you.”
“Boss, my niece, Beesiwa, is a polytechnic graduate, very beautiful and with very good character.
“Unfortunately, her parents virtually forced her into a relationship with an idiot based in the US, which affected her badly. She has now recovered from that experience and, Boss, I am respectfully asking if you would find a job for her.
“I promise you that you will never regret it.”
“Well, Wofa Yaw, let me meet her and speak with her. I may be able to help, maybe not in the way you expect, but let me meet her.
“I will not be back here for another week, but I will be at the office throughout next week. You can come with her.”
On Monday morning, Wofa Yaw and Beesiwa were seated at the office by nine o’clock. Three young ladies welcomed them warmly, offered them soft drinks and assured them that Kakraba would be there shortly.
They then returned to their desks and sat behind computers with large screens displaying various building designs.
Kakraba walked in and greeted them warmly. After chatting briefly with the three ladies, he ushered Wofa Yaw and Beesiwa into his office.
“Director, this is my niece, Beesiwa. I mentioned her to you when you came to Nsawam.”
“Yes, indeed. Madam Beesiwa, you are very beautiful, just as your uncle said. Wofa Yaw is my colleague.
“We have just started a building project that will take about three to four years. He mentioned that you have a small problem, so I said I would like to meet you and see how I can help.
“So, Beesiwa, please tell me a little about yourself.”
Beesiwa described her childhood, her school experience, her brief work at the bank and the nasty episode with Sammy Abrokwa, which shattered her peaceful life. She also explained how she had been recovering from the experience.
“I am really sorry to hear this,” Kakraba said. “Now, here is what we are going to do.
“We are a small but very busy company. The three ladies out there spend most of the day on site and come back to report on their work in the morning.
“I have three main projects. The big one is an estate project in Nsawam, where your uncle is one of my main colleagues. I need a personal assistant who can take care of my activities, especially when I am not in town.
“Now, we will have to start with trust. Based on what I know about Wofa Yaw, and based on what you yourself have told me, I think we can start on a sound basis.
“So, Wofa Yaw will take you to my home. You can move into one of the four guest rooms.”
“Sir, I have taken some computer lessons, and I have even done graphics and web design,” Beesiwa said.
“Fantastic! I will give you a good phone and a laptop. I will also arrange computer lessons for you.”
“Now, Wofa Yaw, take her home. My sister, Kuukuwa, will meet you and show you around, and then you can return to Koforidua.
“When would you like to start work?”
“Sir, I would like to start today, but I would need to go and bring my things.”
“No problem. Take a taxi to my house, meet my sister, and let me know what you decide.”
Later that day, Kakraba and the three ladies met with some bank officials to conclude the sale of the three buildings at Adabraka.
They closed at five-thirty and, after rewarding the ladies for their hard work, Kakraba got home just after dark.
He was surprised to find Kuukuwa and Beesiwa sitting at the table enjoying supper.
“What’s happening here?” he asked. “Beesiwa, I thought you would return to Koforidua.”
“She changed her mind,” Kuukuwa said. “We went to the mall and bought a few things for her. Then we came back to cook. She has made some nice changes to your bedroom and cooked a couple of interesting dishes. Sit down; we will serve you.”
“Well, I certainly can’t refuse that. It’s been a busy day.
“So, what’s the plan now? Will Beesiwa go to Koforidua tomorrow, gather her things together and come down?”
“No, I will stay here for a while,” Beesiwa replied. “Kuukuwa bought me the things I need, so I may go back next week. I’m ready to start work. What would you like me to start with?”
“Well, you can come to the office tomorrow morning, meet the three girls and get a feel for what we do.
“Since you are living here, at least for now, we can discuss the plans for the next few weeks.
“Sometimes there are gaps when I travel up north. You can take care of things from now. I think the girls would like having someone like you around.”
By Ekow de Heer
SKIP THE QUEUE, TAP THE NEWS
You can now read the Ghanaian Times and The Spectator newspapers from the comfort of your device via TimesNewsPlus.
Join our WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBElzjInlqHhl1aTU27
A frequent question following breast surgery is whether human tissue possesses the regenerative capacity to restore an excised organ.
From a strict physiological standpoint, a completely removed breast cannot regrow. Unlike certain organisms that can regenerate complex limbs or organs, adult human tissues—particularly specialised glandular structures—lack the cellular machinery required to rebuild an entire organ after its total surgical removal.
Instead, the body heals the surgical site through processes such as scar tissue formation and re-epithelialisation rather than complete cellular regeneration.
What a mastectomy actually removes
To understand why natural tissue regeneration does not occur, it is important to examine the surgical scope of a mastectomy.
Depending on the type of procedure and the medical reason for surgery, a mastectomy may involve the removal of:
Glandular architecture: The milk-producing lobules and ducts that form the functional core of the mammary gland.
Adipose tissue: The fatty tissue that contributes to breast volume, projection and contour.
Other breast tissue: The extent of tissue removal varies according to the type of mastectomy and the need to achieve appropriate surgical clearance.
Because specialised breast structures are physically removed, the body does not rebuild a complete mammary gland. Instead, healing occurs through tissue repair and scar formation.
Distinguishing residual tissue from “regrowth”
Patients or observers may notice changes in the chest area after surgery, sometimes leading to misconceptions about tissue regeneration.
Skin- and nipple-sparing procedures
Modern breast surgery may preserve the outer skin envelope or, in selected cases, the nipple-areola complex. Small amounts of breast tissue may remain depending on the surgical technique. Any changes in remaining tissue due to hormonal fluctuations represent residual tissue responding to the body, rather than the regrowth of a completely removed breast.
Adipose accumulation
Weight gain after surgery can increase the amount of subcutaneous fat across the chest wall. However, this is part of general body fat distribution and does not represent the regeneration of a mammary gland.
Modern reconstructive pathways
Because a completely removed breast does not naturally regenerate, modern medicine offers reconstructive options aimed at restoring physical symmetry, contour and body image.
The two main approaches are implant-based reconstruction and autologous, or tissue-based, reconstruction.
Implant-based reconstruction
Implant-based reconstruction uses synthetic medical devices, typically filled with silicone gel or saline, to rebuild the breast mound following a mastectomy.
The two-stage process: This approach may begin with the placement of a temporary tissue expander to gradually create space and stretch the surrounding tissues. A later procedure may then be performed to place a permanent implant.
Recovery profile: Implant-based reconstruction generally involves a shorter initial surgery and recovery period compared with procedures that require tissue to be harvested from another part of the body.
Long-term considerations: Breast implants are not lifetime devices and require ongoing medical monitoring. Some patients may need additional procedures over time because of complications or changes in the implant or surrounding tissue.
Autologous or tissue-based reconstruction
Autologous reconstruction uses the patient’s own living tissue to create a new breast mound. Tissue may be transferred from another part of the body, commonly the lower abdomen, using procedures such as a DIEP flap.
Natural look and feel: Because the reconstruction uses living tissue, it can provide a natural warmth, texture and softness. The tissue may also change with the patient’s body weight over time.
Long-term durability: Once healing is complete, autologous reconstruction can provide a long-lasting result without the need to replace an implant. However, some patients may still require further procedures.
Complex surgery: This option usually involves a longer operation and recovery period. In microsurgical procedures, surgeons may need to reconnect tiny blood vessels to establish blood flow to the transferred tissue.
Direct comparison
When choosing between these two reconstructive pathways, patients and their surgical teams must consider several physical, medical and lifestyle factors.
Surgical burden: Implant surgery is generally less invasive, while flap reconstruction involves surgery at both the chest and the donor site.
Foreign material versus native tissue: Implants involve the use of a medical device, while autologous reconstruction uses the patient’s own tissue.
Recovery: The recovery timelines and rehabilitation requirements differ significantly between the two procedures.
Recovery and physical rehabilitation
Recovering from breast reconstruction requires patience, careful pacing and, in some cases, structured physical rehabilitation.
Because implant-based and autologous tissue-flap procedures involve different surgical techniques, their healing timelines and physical therapy milestones can vary considerably.
Understanding these differences is important for patients considering reconstruction, as the choice involves more than restoring physical appearance. It also requires careful consideration of recovery, long-term monitoring, lifestyle and individual medical needs.
Part 2 will examine recovery timelines, physical therapy milestones and other factors patients should consider when choosing between reconstructive options.
By Robert Ekow Grimmond-Thompson
SKIP THE QUEUE, TAP THE NEWS
You can now read the Ghanaian Times and The Spectator newspapers from the comfort of your device via TimesNewsPlus.
Join our WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBElzjInlqHhl1aTU27
