Why Ghana’s ‘no bed syndrome’ is a policy failure, not a clinical failure – Part one

OVER the years, No Bed Syndrome has been a major headache in Ghana’s health system. People have expressed different views and today my friend and classmate Professor Jonathan Laryea takes his turn and makes extremely important contributions that should start a deep conversation.

Professor Laryea writes;

Every few months, Ghana wakes up to a familiar, tragic headline. A prominent citizen, a pregnant mother, or a young accident victim has died in the back of an ambulance. They didn’t die because medical science failed them; they died because they spent their “Golden Hour”, the critical window between life and death, touring the gates of hospitals that had no room to receive them.

The public outcry follows a predictable script: anger at the hospitals, calls for “compassion” from doctors and nurses, and a frantic directive from the minister of health and parliament. A few years ago, the directive was simple: No hospital can turn a patient away. The result? We didn’t create more beds; we simply moved the crisis from the ambulance floor to the hospital floor. That also created another outrage.

It is time to stop blaming the frontline workers and start looking at the math. The “No Bed Syndrome” is not a failure of healthcare workers; it is a failure of a country that has not matched its resources to its population growth. Most recently, an engineer lost his life after being involved in an accident. The ambulance drove around for hours before getting to Korle Bu. Though the outcome was sad, I would venture to say that even if Korle Bu had a bed to treat this patient, the outcome would likely have been the same given the time between the accident and when the ambulance got to Korle Bu. When you have a patient exsanguinating, time is of the essence. Even if he got to the right place in time, the other question is would they have enough blood to resuscitate him without requiring family to donate prior to administering the blood?

The impossible equation

Consider the capital city. Accra has a population of approximately 2.9 – 4 million people, depending on who you ask. To serve this massive, high-density population, there are fewer than 400 dedicated emergency room beds across major public facilities.

Let’s do the math: that is roughly one emergency bed for every 10,000 citizens. That is not a recipe for success. When a system is constantly operating at 110 per cent capacity, “No Bed” isn’t an excuse, it is a physical reality. When we force doctors and nurses to treat patients on the floor, we aren’t “solving” the problem; we are compromising hygiene, dignity, and clinical outcomes. You cannot perform a high-quality resuscitation on a crowded floor. This is a capacity issue. We cannot expect this issue to fix itself. There is the need to increase emergency capacity across the metropolis and indeed across the country.

A system in need of coordination

The second failure is logistical. Ghana has made strides in developing a National Ambulance Service (NAS), but we have failed to give that service a “brain” to coordinate it. Currently, an ambulance driver picks up a patient and begins a desperate, manual search for a vacancy. They drive from Ridge Hospital to 37 Military Hospital to Korle-Bu, burning through the patient’s oxygen and time. In an era of digital transformation, it is inexcusable that our ambulances do not have a real-time, cloud-based dashboard showing exactly where the nearest available specialised bed is located. An ambulance without a coordinated dispatch system is just a high-speed hearse.

Beyond the furniture: The “emergency mindset”

A bed, however, is just a piece of furniture if it is not backed by an emergency pathway. The true “No Bed Syndrome” includes a lack of specialised systems. In modern medicine, the “Golden Hour” dictates that, for example:

• For a heart attack: We must be able to perform cardiac catheterization within 60 to 90 minutes.

• For a stroke: We must have the ability to perform a CT scan and administer clot-busting medication within an hour.

In Ghana, if you have a stroke or heart attack, your survival depends more on your luck and your traffic route than on a standardised medical protocol. If a patient reaches a bed but the CT scanner is broken or there is no Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory or the Catheterisation laboratory is unstaffed/unresourced, the “syndrome” has simply moved from the ambulance to the ward. We have failed to develop the specialized “hubs” required to treat these time-sensitive killers. Accident cases are even worse. The ability to give blood emergently to exsanguinating patients does not exist. Some patients need immediate surgery; for example, patients with gunshot wounds and stab wounds. Sending such patients to a facility where they cannot do emergency surgery is unhelpful.

We must develop a system for triaging patients to the right facilities. There is a need to do a thorough evaluation of our healthcare delivery system and redesign a system that works for Ghanaians. It looks like we have done a patchwork of modifications to what Governor Guggisberg left us and after 69 years of self-governance, we have failed to redesign a system that works for modern-day realities.

Prof. Jonathan Laryea is a Professor of Surgery at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, Arkansas. He is board certified in General Surgery, Colorectal Surgery and Clinical Informatics.

He is a graduate of the University of Ghana Medical School (Class of 1997).